Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of Computed Tomography Scoring Systems in Patients with COVID-19 and Hematological Malignancies.
Halaburda-Rola, Marta; Drozd-Sokolowska, Joanna; Januszewicz, Magdalena; Grabowska-Derlatka, Laretta.
  • Halaburda-Rola M; IInd Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
  • Drozd-Sokolowska J; Department of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
  • Januszewicz M; IInd Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
  • Grabowska-Derlatka L; IInd Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(9)2023 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315140
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Numerous computed tomography (CT) scales have been proposed to assess lung involvement in COVID-19 pneumonia as well as correlate radiological findings with patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:

Comparison of different CT scoring systems in terms of time consumption and diagnostic performance in patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis included hematological patients with COVID-19 and CT performed within 10 days of diagnosis of infection. CT scans were analyzed in three different semi-quantitative scoring systems, Chest CT Severity Score (CT-SS), Chest CT Score(CT-S), amd Total Severity Score (TSS), as well as qualitative modified Total Severity Score (m-TSS). Time consumption and diagnostic performance were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Fifty hematological patients were included. Based on the ICC values, excellent inter-observer reliability was found among the three semi-quantitative methods with ICC > 0.9 (p < 0.001). The inter-observer concordance was at the level of perfect agreement (kappa value = 1) for the mTSS method (p < 0.001). The three-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed excellent and very good diagnostic accuracy for the three quantitative scoring systems. The AUC values were excellent (0.902), very good (0.899), and very good (0.881) in the CT-SS, CT-S and TSS scoring systems, respectively. Sensitivity showed high levels at 72.7%, 75%, and 65.9%, respectively, and specificity was recorded at 98.2%, 100%, 94.6% for the CT-SS, CT-S, and TSS scoring systems, respectively. Time consumption was the same for Chest CT Severity Score and TSS and was longer for Chest CT Score (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Chest CT score and chest CT severity score have very high sensitivity and specificity in terms of diagnostic accuracy. The highest AUC values and the shortest median time of analysis in chest CT severity score indicate this method as preferred for semi-quantitative assessment of chest CT in hematological patients with COVID-19.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cancers15092417

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cancers15092417