Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Early Inflammatory Profiles Predict Maximal Disease Severity in Covid-19
Topics in Antiviral Medicine ; 31(2):109, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2315997
ABSTRACT

Background:

Better understanding of host inflammatory changes that precede development of severe COVID-19 could improve delivery of available antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies, and provide insights for the development of new therapies. Method(s) In plasma from individuals with COVID-19, sampled <=10 days from symptom onset from the All-Ireland Infectious Diseases Cohort study, we measured 61 biomarkers, including markers of innate immune and T cell activation, coagulation, tissue repair, lung injury, and immune regulation. We used principal component analysis (PCA) and k-means clustering to derive biomarker clusters, and univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression to explore association between cluster membership and maximal disease severity, adjusting for risk factors for severe COVID-19, including age, sex, ethnicity, BMI, hypertension and diabetes. Result(s) From March 2020-April 2021, we included 312 individuals, (median (IQR) age 62 (48-77) years, 7 (4-9) days from symptom onset, 54% male) in the analysis. PCA and clustering derived 4 clusters. Compared to cluster 1, clusters 2-4 were significantly older and of higher BMI but there were no significant differences in sex or ethnicity. Cluster 1 had low levels of inflammation, cluster 2 had higher levels of markers of tissue repair and endothelial activation (EGF, VEGF, PDGF, TGFalpha, serpin E1 and p-selectin). Cluster 3 and 4 were both characterised by higher overall inflammation, but compared to cluster 4, cluster 3 had downregulation of growth factors, markers of endothelial activation, and immune regulation (IL10, PDL1), but higher alveolar epithelial injury markers (RAGE, ST2). In univariate analysis, compared to cluster 1, cluster 3 had the highest odds of severe disease (OR (95% CI) 9.02 (4.62-18.31), followed by cluster 4 5.59 (2.75-11.72) then cluster 2 4.5 (2.38-8.81), all p < 0.05). Cluster 3 remained most strongly associated with severe disease in fully adjusted analyses;cluster 3 OR(95% CI) 5.99 (2.69-13.35), cluster 2 3.14 (1.54-6.42), cluster 4 3.13 (1.36-7.19), all p< 0.05). Conclusion(s) Distinct early inflammatory profiles predicted maximal disease severity independent of known risk factors for severe COVID-19. A cluster characterised by downregulation of growth factor and endothelial markers and early evidence of alveolar injury was associated with highest risk of developing severe COVID19. Whether this reflects a dysregulated inflammatory response that could improve targeted treatment requires further study. Heatmap of biomarker derived clusters and forest plot of association between clusters and disease severity. A Heatmap demonstrating differences in biomarkers between clusters B Forest plot demonstrating odds ratio of specific clusters for progressing to moderate or severe disease (reference Cluster 1), calculated using ordinal logistic regression. Odds ratio (95% CI) presented as unadjusted and fully adjusted (for age, sex, ethnicity, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, immunosuppression, smoking and baseline anticoagulant use). Maximal disease severity graded per the WHO severity scale.
Keywords
Search on Google
Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Topics in Antiviral Medicine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Topics in Antiviral Medicine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article