Magseed wide local excisions - The first 50

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Prior to 2021, impalpable tumours in our unit were localised with Somatex wires. During the COVID pandemic we introduced Magseed due to its logistical advantages in allowing surgery on a site distant from our breast unit. We wanted to ensure our clinical outcomes with this new system were equivalent to those using wire localisation. Method(s) Electronic records for the first 50 consecutive Magseed localised wide local excisions and the preceding 50 consecutive wire localised wide local excisions were compared. Excision biopsies, palpable lesions, bracketed lesions and post neoadjuvant treatment patients were excluded. Patient demographics, tumour size, inadequate radial margin involvement rate, reoperation rate for margins, specimen weight, number of cavity shaves and operative time were recorded. [Formula presented] Results: Results are shown in table 1. There were no preoperative differences in the two groups. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups, with a trend towards lower margin involvement rates but more shaves in the Magseed group. The mean operative time was slightly shorter in the Magseed group despite more axillary procedures being performed in this group. Conclusion(s) The change to the Magseed system led to logistical advantages with patient outcomes at least equivalent to wire guided excision.Copyright © 2023