Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Defining ready for discharge from sub-acute care: a qualitative exploration from multiple stakeholder perspectives.
Gledhill, Kate; Bucknall, Tracey K; Lannin, Natasha A; Hanna, Lisa.
  • Gledhill K; School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. kate.gledhill@monash.edu.
  • Bucknall TK; School of Primary and Allied Healthcare, Monash University, Frankston, Australia. kate.gledhill@monash.edu.
  • Lannin NA; Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary Health and Allied Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia. kate.gledhill@monash.edu.
  • Hanna L; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 425, 2023 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323282
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Planning discharges from subacute care facilities is becoming increasingly complex due to an ageing population and a high demand on services. The use of non-standardised assessments to determine a patient's readiness for discharge places a heavy reliance on a clinician's judgement which can be influenced by system pressures, past experiences and team dynamics. The current literature focusses heavily on discharge-readiness from clinicians' perspectives and in the acute care setting. This paper aimed to explore the perceptions of discharge-readiness from the perspectives of key stakeholders in subacute care inpatients, family members, clinicians and managers.

METHODS:

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted, exploring the views of inpatients (n = 16), family members (n = 16), clinicians (n = 17) and managers (n = 12). Participants with cognitive deficits and those who did not speak English were excluded from this study. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted and audio-recorded. Following transcription, inductive thematic analysis was completed.

RESULTS:

Participants identified that there are both patient-related and environmental factors that influence discharge-readiness. Patient-related factors discussed included continence, functional mobility, cognition, pain and medication management skills. Environmental factors centred around the discharge (home) environment, and were suggested to include a safe physical environment alongside a robust social environment which was suggested to assist to fill any gaps in functional capabilities (i.e. patient-related factors).

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings make a unique contribution to the literature by providing a thorough exploration of determining discharge-readiness as a combined narrative from the perspectives from key stakeholders. Findings from this qualitative study identified key personal and environmental factors influencing patients' discharge-readiness, which may allow health services to streamline the determination of discharge-readiness from subacute care. Understanding how these factors might be assessed within a discharge pathway warrants further attention.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Discharge / Subacute Care Type of study: Experimental Studies / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-023-09285-y

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Discharge / Subacute Care Type of study: Experimental Studies / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-023-09285-y