Your browser doesn't support javascript.
SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection by saliva; an alternative to nasopharyngeal specimen: A cross-sectional study.
Jubair, Mohammad; Rahman, Sezanur; Begum, Mst Noorjahan; Talha, Muhammad; Musarrat, Raisha; Rahman, A K M Shafiqur; Uddin, Mohammed Shehab; Wen, AiMin; Ning, YaoHui; Nahar, Kamrun; Rahman, Mohammed Ziaur; Rahman, Mustafizur.
  • Jubair M; Virology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division icddr,b: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Rahman S; Virology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division icddr,b: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Begum MN; Virology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division icddr,b: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Talha M; Virology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division icddr,b: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Musarrat R; Virology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division icddr,b: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Rahman AKMS; COVID Unit DNCC Dedicated Covid-19 Hospital Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Uddin MS; COVID Unit Kuwait Bangladesh Friendship Government Hospital Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Wen A; R&D InTec PRODUCTS, INC Fujian China.
  • Ning Y; R&D InTec PRODUCTS, INC Fujian China.
  • Nahar K; Virology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division icddr,b: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Rahman MZ; Virology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division icddr,b: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Rahman M; Virology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division icddr,b: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Health Sci Rep ; 6(5): e1275, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323923
ABSTRACT
Background and

Aims:

Saliva samples are less invasive and more convenient for patients than naso- and/or oropharynx swabs (NOS). However, there is no US Food and Drug Administration-approved severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rapid antigen test kit, which can be useful in a prolonged pandemic to reduce transmission by allowing suspected individuals to self-sampling. We evaluated the performances of High sensitive AQ+ Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test (AQ+ kit) using nasopharyngeal swabs (NPs) and saliva specimens from the same patients in laboratory conditions.

Methods:

The real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test result was used for screening the inrolled individuals and compared as the gold standard. NP and saliva samples were collected from 100 rRT-PCR positives and 100 negative individuals and tested with an AQ+ kit.

Results:

The AQ+ kit showed good performances in both NP and saliva samples with an overall accuracy of 98.5% and 94.0%, and sensitivity of 97.0% and 88.0%, respectively. In both cases, specificity was 100%. AQ+ kit performance with saliva was in the range of the World Health Organization recommended value.

Conclusion:

xOur findings indicate that the saliva specimen can be used as an alternative and less invasive to NPs for quick and reliable SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Health Sci Rep Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Health Sci Rep Year: 2023 Document Type: Article