Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Cough desensitization treatment for patients with refractory chronic cough: results of a second pilot randomized control trial.
Slovarp, Laurie J; Reynolds, Jane E; Tolbert, Sophia; Campbell, Sarah; Welby, Shannon; Morkrid, Paige.
  • Slovarp LJ; University of Montana, School of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, Missoula, MT, USA. laurie.slovarp@umontana.edu.
  • Reynolds JE; University of Montana, School of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, Missoula, MT, USA.
  • Tolbert S; University of Montana, School of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, Missoula, MT, USA.
  • Campbell S; University of Montana, School of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, Missoula, MT, USA.
  • Welby S; University of Montana, School of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, Missoula, MT, USA.
  • Morkrid P; University of Montana, School of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, Missoula, MT, USA.
BMC Pulm Med ; 23(1): 148, 2023 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2326368
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to collect pilot efficacy data on a novel treatment for refractory chronic cough (RCC), which we call cough desensitization treatment (CDT). DESIGN AND

METHODS:

In this parallel cohort, sham-controlled, randomized controlled trial, 21 adults with RCC were randomly assigned to 12 sessions of either CDT (progressive doses of aerosolized capsaicin while behaviorally suppressing cough; n = 11) or a sham treatment (repeated exposure to aerosolized saline; n = 9). The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was the primary outcome measure. Perceived cough severity with a visual analogue scale and cough challenge testing (for measuring cough-reflex sensitivity) were secondary outcome measures. Data were analyzed with mixed effects linear regression and follow-up contrasts.

RESULTS:

Results on all measures favored CDT. Excluding one sham participant, whose baseline LCQ scores were deemed unreliable, mean change in LCQ at 3-weeks post treatment was 6.35 and 2.17 in the CDT and sham groups, respectively. There was moderate to strong evidence of a greater improvement in the CDT group in total LCQ score (p = .058) and LCQ Psychological domain (p = .026) and Physical domain (p = .045) scores. Strong evidence was found for a greater reduction in urge-to-cough during CCT in the CDT group (p = .037) and marginal for a reduction in the capsaicin cough-reflex sensitivity (p = .094). There was weak evidence of a greater reduction in cough severity in the CDT group (p = .103).

DISCUSSION:

Although the study is limited due to the small sample size, the data provide additional evidence supporting further research on CDT. CDT resulted in a greater change in the primary efficacy measure (LCQ) than both pharmaceutical and behavioral treatments currently found in the literature. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial (NCT05226299) was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov on 07/02/2022.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Kidney Neoplasms Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Pulm Med Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12890-023-02423-6

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Kidney Neoplasms Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Pulm Med Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12890-023-02423-6