Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Making the most of the first prenatal visit: The challenge of expanding prenatal genetic testing options and limited clinical encounter time.
Farrell, Ruth M; Pierce, Madelyn; Collart, Christina; Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; Chien, Edward; Coleridge, Marissa; Rose, Susannah L; Perni, Uma; Frankel, Richard.
  • Farrell RM; Obstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Pierce M; Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Collart C; Center for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Edmonds BT; Obstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Chien E; Obstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Coleridge M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Rose SL; Obstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Perni U; Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Frankel R; Center for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Prenat Diagn ; 40(10): 1265-1271, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-343193
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Advances in prenatal genetics place additional challenges as patients must receive information about a growing array of screening and testing options. This raises concerns about how to achieve a shared decision-making process that prepares patients to make an informed decision about their choices about prenatal genetic screening and testing options, calling for a reconsideration of how healthcare providers approach the first prenatal visit.

METHODS:

We conducted interviews with 40 pregnant women to identify components of decision-making regarding prenatal genetic screens and tests at this visit. Analysis was approached using grounded theory.

RESULTS:

Participants brought distinct notions of risk to the visit, including skewed perceptions of baseline risk for a fetal genetic condition and the implications of screening and testing. Participants were very concerned about financial considerations associated with these options, ranking out-of-pocket costs on par with medical considerations. Participants noted diverging priorities at the first visit from those of their healthcare provider, leading to barriers to shared decision-making regarding screening and testing during this visit.

CONCLUSION:

Research is needed to determine how to restructure the initiation of prenatal care in a way that best positions patients to make informed decisions about prenatal genetic screens and tests.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Care / Genetic Testing / Decision Making Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Prenat Diagn Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Pd.5752

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Care / Genetic Testing / Decision Making Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Prenat Diagn Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Pd.5752