Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Why Challenge Trials of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Could Be Ethical Despite Risk of Severe Adverse Events.
Eyal, Nir.
  • Eyal N; Directs the Center for Population-Level Bioethics at Rutgers University and is the Henry Rutgers professor of bioethics in the Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy at Rutgers School of Public Health and in the Department of Philosophy at Rutgers's School of Arts and Sciences.
Ethics Hum Res ; 42(4): 24-34, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-343201
ABSTRACT
Human challenge trials to test the efficacy of vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus behind Covid-19, could save considerable time and many lives. But they may initially seem unethical because they expose healthy volunteers to a live virus that is killing many people and for which no cure exists. This article argues that this is not the correct test of their ethics. The correct test is comparative. And in the special circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic, human challenge trials meet the correct test better than standard efficacy testing would.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Viral Vaccines / Clinical Trials as Topic / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics Type of study: Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ethics Hum Res Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Viral Vaccines / Clinical Trials as Topic / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics Type of study: Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ethics Hum Res Year: 2020 Document Type: Article