Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Applicability of the CURB-65 pneumonia severity score for outpatient treatment of COVID-19.
Nguyen, Yann; Corre, Félix; Honsel, Vasco; Curac, Sonja; Zarrouk, Virginie; Fantin, Bruno; Galy, Adrien.
  • Nguyen Y; Departement of Internal Medicine, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France; Center for Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: yann.nguyen2@aphp.fr.
  • Corre F; Departement of Internal Medicine, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France.
  • Honsel V; Departement of Internal Medicine, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France.
  • Curac S; Department of Emergency, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
  • Zarrouk V; Departement of Internal Medicine, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France.
  • Fantin B; Departement of Internal Medicine, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France.
  • Galy A; Departement of Internal Medicine, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France.
J Infect ; 81(3): e96-e98, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-401340
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The CURB-65 is a severity score to predict mortality secondary to community acquired pneumonia and is widely used to identify patients who can be managed as outpatients. However, whether CURB-65 can be applicable to COVID-19 patients for the decision of outpatient treatment is still unknown.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective single-centre study assessing the performance of the CURB-65 to predict the risk of poor outcome, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation and/or death, among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The association between the CURB-65 and the outcome was assessed by a univariable Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS:

A total of 279 patients were hospitalized between March 15th and April 14th, 2020. According to the CURB-65, 171 (61.3%) patients were considered at low risk (CURB-65 01), 66 (23.7%) at intermediate risk (CURB-65=2), and 42 (15.1%) had high risk of 30-day mortality (CURB-65 35). During the study period, 88 (31.5%) patients had a poor outcome. The CURB-65 was strongly associated with a poor outcome (Pfor linear trend <0.001). However, among patients with a CURB-65 of 01, thus considered at low risk, 36/171 (21.1%) had a poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study suggests that the applicability of CURB-65 to guide the decision of inpatient or outpatient care is scarce, as it does not safely identify patients who could be managed as outpatients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia / Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Coronavirus / Community-Acquired Infections / Pandemics Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: J Infect Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia / Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Coronavirus / Community-Acquired Infections / Pandemics Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: J Infect Year: 2020 Document Type: Article