Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Arbidol monotherapy is superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19.
Zhu, Zhen; Lu, Zhaohui; Xu, Tianmin; Chen, Cong; Yang, Gang; Zha, Tao; Lu, Jianchun; Xue, Yuan.
  • Zhu Z; Institute of Hepatology, the Third People's Hospital of Changzhou, No. 300 Lanling North Road, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China; Clinical Laboratory, the Third People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Lu Z; Department of Respiratory Diseases, the Second People's Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
  • Xu T; Department of Infectious Diseases, the Third People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Chen C; Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Yang G; Department of Respiratory Diseases, the Second People's Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
  • Zha T; Wuhu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
  • Lu J; Institute of Hepatology, the Third People's Hospital of Changzhou, No. 300 Lanling North Road, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China; Department of Liver Diseases, the Third People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Xue Y; Institute of Hepatology, the Third People's Hospital of Changzhou, No. 300 Lanling North Road, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China; Department of Liver Diseases, the Third People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China. Electronic address: xueyuan80908@163.com.
J Infect ; 81(1): e21-e23, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-45736
ABSTRACT
Lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol have been previously used to treat acute respiratory syndrome- coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in clinical practice; nevertheless, their effectiveness remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with the 2019-nCoV disease (COVID-19). Fifty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were divided into two groups including lopinavir/ritonavir group (34 cases) and arbidol group (16 cases). Lopinavir/ritonavir group received 400 mg/100mg of Lopinavir/ritonavir, twice a day for a week, while the arbidol group was given 0.2 g arbidol, three times a day. Data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The cycle threshold values of open reading frame 1ab and nucleocapsid genes by RT-PCR assay were monitored during antiviral therapy. None of the patients developed severe pneumonia or ARDS. There was no difference in fever duration between the two groups (P=0.61). On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group, but the viral load was found in 15(44.1%) patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test compared to those in the lopinavir/ritonavir group (P<0.01). Moreover, no apparent side effects were found in both groups. In conclusion, our data indicate that arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antiviral Agents / Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Ritonavir / Lopinavir / Betacoronavirus / Indoles Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Infect Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jinf.2020.03.060

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antiviral Agents / Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Ritonavir / Lopinavir / Betacoronavirus / Indoles Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Infect Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.jinf.2020.03.060