Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Clinical Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR Assay Targeting the Nucleocapsid Gene.
SoRelle, Jeffrey A; Frame, Ithiel; Falcon, Alejandra; Jacob, Jerin; Wagenfuehr, Jennifer; Mitui, Midori; Park, Jason Y; Filkins, Laura.
  • SoRelle JA; Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Frame I; Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Falcon A; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Health System of Texas, Dallas, TX.
  • Jacob J; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Health System of Texas, Dallas, TX.
  • Wagenfuehr J; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Health System of Texas, Dallas, TX.
  • Mitui M; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Health System of Texas, Dallas, TX.
  • Park JY; Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Filkins L; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Health System of Texas, Dallas, TX.
J Appl Lab Med ; 5(5): 889-896, 2020 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-459329
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA is important for the diagnosis and management of COVID-19.

METHODS:

We present a clinical validation of a reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assay for the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N1) gene. Off-board lysis on an automated nucleic acid extraction system was optimized with endemic coronaviruses (OC43 and NL63). Genomic RNA and SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a recombinant viral protein coat were used as control materials and compared for recovery from nucleic acid extraction.

RESULTS:

Nucleic acid extraction showed decreased recovery of endemic Coronavirus in vitro transcribed RNA (NL63) compared with attenuated virus (OC43). SARS-CoV-2 RNA had more reliable recovery from extraction through amplification than genomic RNA. Recovery of genomic RNA was improved by combining lysis buffer with clinical matrix before adding RNA. The RT-PCR assay demonstrated 100% in silico sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy across samples was 100% (75 of 75). Precision studies showed 100% intra-run, inter-run, and inter-technologist concordance. The limit of detection was 264 copies per milliliter (estimated 5 copies per reaction; 35.56 mean threshold cycle value).

CONCLUSIONS:

This SARS-CoV-2 assay demonstrates appropriate characteristics for use under an Emergency Use Authorization. Endemic coronavirus controls were useful in optimizing the extraction procedure. In the absence of live or attenuated virus, recombinant virus in a protein coat is an appropriate control specimen type for assay validation during a pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Nucleocapsid Proteins / Betacoronavirus Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Appl Lab Med Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Nucleocapsid Proteins / Betacoronavirus Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Appl Lab Med Year: 2020 Document Type: Article