Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Isolation and quarantine in South Africa during COVID-19: Draconian measures or proportional response?
Moodley, K; Obasa, A E; London, L.
  • Moodley K; Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. km@sun.ac.za.
S Afr Med J ; 110(6): 456-457, 2020 04 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-478287
ABSTRACT
In the midst of an unprecedented public health crisis, extraordinary containment measures must be implemented. These include both isolation and quarantine, either on a voluntary basis or enforced. In the transition from voluntary to mandatory isolation, conflicts arise at the intersection of ethics, human rights and the law. The Siracusa Principles adopted by the United Nations Economic and Social Council in 1985 and enshrined in international human rights legislation and guidelines specify conditions under which civil liberties may be infringed. In order for isolation processes in South Africa to claim legitimacy, it is important that these principles as well as national laws and constitutional rights are embedded in state action.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Isolation / Pneumonia, Viral / Quarantine / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics / Human Rights Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: S Afr Med J Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: SAMJ.2020V110I6.14842

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Isolation / Pneumonia, Viral / Quarantine / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics / Human Rights Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: S Afr Med J Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: SAMJ.2020V110I6.14842