Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Mak, Gannon Ck; Cheng, Peter Kc; Lau, Stephen Sy; Wong, Kitty Ky; Lau, C S; Lam, Edman Tk; Chan, Rickjason Cw; Tsang, Dominic Nc.
  • Mak GC; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. Electronic address: so_phls10@dh.gov.hk.
  • Cheng PK; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Lau SS; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Wong KK; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Lau CS; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Lam ET; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Chan RC; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Tsang DN; All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J Clin Virol ; 129: 104500, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-574549
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The rapid diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is essential to reduce the disease spread. Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are available, however, there is scanty data on the performance of RAD tests.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the performance of the commercially available BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag test and compare it with RT-PCR for detecting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined for the RAD test using viral culture and RT-PCR as reference methods. The RAD test was further evaluated using respiratory samples collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients. The results were compared with RT-PCR test.

RESULTS:

The detection limits between RAD test, viral culture and RT-PCR varied hugely. RAD was 103 fold less sensitive than viral culture while RAD was 105 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. The RAD test detected between 11.1 % and 45.7 % of RT-PCR-positive samples from COVID-19 patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrated that the RAD test serves only as adjunct to RT-PCR test because of potential for false-negative results.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Immunoassay / Coronavirus Infections / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Betacoronavirus / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Immunoassay / Coronavirus Infections / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Betacoronavirus / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Virol Journal subject: Virology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article