Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Behavior of the PR interval with increasing heart rate in patients with COVID-19.
Pavri, Behzad B; Kloo, Juergen; Farzad, Darius; Riley, Joshua M.
  • Pavri BB; Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: behzad.pavri@jefferson.edu.
  • Kloo J; Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Farzad D; Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Riley JM; Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Heart Rhythm ; 17(9): 1434-1438, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-593448
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Myriad manifestations of cardiovascular involvement have been described in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but there have been no reports of COVID-19 affecting the cardiac conduction system. The PR interval on the electrocardiogram (ECG) normally shortens with increasing heart rate (HR). The case of a patient with COVID-19 manifesting Mobitz type 1 atrioventricular (AV) block that normalized as the patient's condition improved prompted us to investigate PR interval behavior in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to characterize PR interval behavior in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and to correlate that behavior with clinical outcomes.

METHODS:

This study was a cross-sectional cohort analysis of confirmed COVID-19 cases (March 26, 2020, to April 25, 2020). We reviewed pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 ECGs to characterize AV conduction by calculating the PR interval to HR (PRHR) slope. Clinical endpoints were death or need for endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS:

ECGs from 75 patients (246 pre-COVID-19 ECGs and 246 COVID-19 ECGs) were analyzed for PRHR slope. Of these patients, 38 (50.7%) showed the expected PR interval shortening with increasing HR (negative PRHR slope), whereas 37 (49.3%) showed either no change (8 with PRHR slope = 0) or paradoxical PR interval prolongation (29 with positive PRHR slope) with increasing HR. Patients without PR interval shortening were more likely to die (11/37 [29.7%] vs 3/38 [7.9%]; P = .019) or require endotracheal intubation (16/37 [43.2%] vs 8/38 [21.1%]; P = .05) compared to patients with PR interval shortening.

CONCLUSION:

Half of patients with COVID-19 showed abnormal PR interval behavior (paradoxical prolongation or lack of shortening) with increasing HR. This finding was associated with increased risk of death and need for endotracheal intubation.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus / Heart Conduction System / Heart Rate Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Heart Rhythm Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus / Heart Conduction System / Heart Rate Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Heart Rhythm Year: 2020 Document Type: Article