Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks.
Hua, Wei; Zuo, Ying; Wan, Ruoyu; Xiong, Lidan; Tang, Jie; Zou, Lin; Shu, Xiaohong; Li, Li.
  • Hua W; Department of Dermatovenereology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Zuo Y; Cosmetic Safety and Efficacy Evaluation Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Wan R; Department of Dermatovenereology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Xiong L; Department of Dermatovenereology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Tang J; Cosmetic Safety and Efficacy Evaluation Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Zou L; Cosmetic Safety and Efficacy Evaluation Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Shu X; Cosmetic Safety and Efficacy Evaluation Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Li L; Cosmetic Safety and Efficacy Evaluation Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(2): 115-121, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-610085
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, cases of adverse skin reactions related to the wearing of masks have been observed.

OBJECTIVES:

To analyze the short-term effects of N95 respirators and medical masks, respectively, on skin physiological properties and to report adverse skin reactions caused by the protective equipment.

METHODS:

This study used a randomized crossover design with repeated measurements. Twenty healthy Chinese volunteers were recruited. Skin parameters were measured on areas covered by the respective masks and on uncovered skin 2 and 4 hours after donning, and 0.5 and 1 hour after removing the masks, including skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), erythema, pH, and sebum secretion. Adverse reactions were clinically assessed, and perceived discomfort and non-compliance measured.

RESULTS:

Skin hydration, TEWL, and pH increased significantly with wearing the protective equipment. Erythema values increased from baseline. Sebum secretion increased both on the covered and uncovered skin with equipment-wearing. There was no significant difference in physiological values between the two types of equipment. More adverse reactions were reported following a N95 mask use than the use of a medical mask, with a higher score of discomfort and non-compliance.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates that skin biophysical characters change as a result of wearing a mask or respirator. N95 respirators were associated with more skin reactions than medical masks.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain / Pneumonia, Viral / Pruritus / Respiratory Protective Devices / Skin / Coronavirus Infections / Erythema / Facial Dermatoses / Pandemics / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Contact Dermatitis Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cod.13601

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain / Pneumonia, Viral / Pruritus / Respiratory Protective Devices / Skin / Coronavirus Infections / Erythema / Facial Dermatoses / Pandemics / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Contact Dermatitis Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cod.13601