Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to prioritize hospital admission of patients affected by COVID-19 in low-resource settings with hospital-bed shortage.
De Nardo, Pasquale; Gentilotti, Elisa; Mazzaferri, Fulvia; Cremonini, Eleonora; Hansen, Paul; Goossens, Herman; Tacconelli, Evelina.
  • De Nardo P; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy. Electronic address: pasquale.denardo@univr.it.
  • Gentilotti E; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy. Electronic address: elisa.gentilotti@univr.it.
  • Mazzaferri F; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: fulvia.mazzaferri@univr.it.
  • Cremonini E; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy. Electronic address: eleonora.cremonini@univr.it.
  • Hansen P; Department of Economics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Electronic address: paul.hansen@otago.ac.nz.
  • Goossens H; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: herman.goossens@uza.be.
  • Tacconelli E; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy. Electronic address: evelina.tacconelli@univr.it.
Int J Infect Dis ; 98: 494-500, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-626276
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To use Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to determine weights for eleven criteria in order to prioritize COVID-19 non-critical patients for admission to hospital in healthcare settings with limited resources.

METHODS:

The MCDA was applied in two main

steps:

specification of criteria for prioritizing COVID-19 patients (and levels within each criterion); and determination of weights for the criteria based on experts' knowledge and experience in managing COVID-19 patients, via an online survey. Criteria were selected based on available COVID-19 evidence with a focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

RESULTS:

The most important criteria (mean weights, summing to 100%) are PaO2 (16.3%); peripheral O2 saturation (15.9%); chest X-ray (14.1%); Modified Early Warning Score-MEWS (11.4%); respiratory rate (9.5%); comorbidities (6.5%); living with vulnerable people (6.4%); body mass index (5.6%); duration of symptoms before hospital evaluation (5.4%); CRP (5.1%); and age (3.8%).

CONCLUSIONS:

At the beginning of a new pandemic, when evidence for disease predictors is limited or unavailable and effective national contingency plans are difficult to establish, the MCDA prioritization model could play a pivotal role in improving the response of health systems.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Admission / Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus / Hospital Bed Capacity Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Int J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Admission / Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus / Hospital Bed Capacity Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Int J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2020 Document Type: Article