Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of In Vitro Inactivation of SARS CoV-2 with Hydrogen Peroxide and Povidone-Iodine Oral Antiseptic Rinses.
Bidra, Avinash S; Pelletier, Jesse S; Westover, Jonna B; Frank, Samantha; Brown, Seth M; Tessema, Belachew.
  • Bidra AS; Department of Reconstructive Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT.
  • Pelletier JS; Ocean Ophthalmology Group, Miami, FL.
  • Westover JB; The Institute for Antiviral Research at Utah State University, Logan, UT.
  • Frank S; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT.
  • Brown SM; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT.
  • Tessema B; ProHealth Physicians Ear Nose and Throat, Farmington, CT.
J Prosthodont ; 29(7): 599-603, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-629624
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the in vitro inactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) and povidone-iodine (PVP-I) oral antiseptic rinses at clinically recommended concentrations and contact times. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

SARS-CoV-2, USA-WA1/2020 strain virus stock was prepared prior to testing by growing in Vero 76 cells. The culture media for prepared virus stock was minimum essential medium (MEM) with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 50 µg/mL gentamicin. Test compounds consisting of PVP-I oral rinse solutions and H2 O2 aqueous solutions were mixed directly with the virus solution so that the final concentration was 50% of the test compound and 50% of the virus solution. Thus PVP-I was tested at concentrations of 0.5%, 1.25%, and 1.5%, and H2 O2 was tested at 3% and 1.5% concentrations to represent clinically recommended concentrations. Ethanol and water were evaluated in parallel as standard positive and negative controls. All samples were tested at contact periods of 15 seconds and 30 seconds. Surviving virus from each sample was then quantified by standard end-point dilution assay and the log reduction value of each compound compared to the negative control was calculated.

RESULTS:

After the 15-second and 30-second contact times, PVP-I oral antiseptic rinse at all 3 concentrations of 0.5%, 1.25%, and 1.5% completely inactivated SARS-CoV-2. The H2 O2 solutions at concentrations of 1.5% and 3.0% showed minimal viricidal activity after 15 seconds and 30 seconds of contact time.

CONCLUSIONS:

SARS-CoV-2 virus was completely inactivated by PVP-I oral antiseptic rinse in vitro, at the lowest concentration of 0.5 % and at the lowest contact time of 15 seconds. Hydrogen peroxide at the recommended oral rinse concentrations of 1.5% and 3.0% was minimally effective as a viricidal agent after contact times as long as 30 seconds. Therefore, preprocedural rinsing with diluted PVP-I in the range of 0.5% to 1.5% may be preferred over hydrogen peroxide during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus / Betacoronavirus / COVID-19 / Anti-Infective Agents, Local Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Prosthodont Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus / Betacoronavirus / COVID-19 / Anti-Infective Agents, Local Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Prosthodont Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2020 Document Type: Article