Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The COVID-19 Catalyst: Analysis of a Tertiary Academic Institution's Rapid Assimilation of Telemedicine.
Davis, Clayton; Novak, Mary; Patel, Apexa; Davis, Cordell; Fitzwater, Ryan; Hale, Nathan.
  • Davis C; Department of Urology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia.
  • Novak M; Department of Urology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia.
  • Patel A; Health Education and Research Institute, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia.
  • Davis C; Department of Urology, Altru Health Systems, Grand Forks, North Dakota.
  • Fitzwater R; Department of Urology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia.
  • Hale N; Department of Urologic Oncology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia.
Urol Pract ; 7(4): 247-251, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-635200
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The COVID-19 pandemic forced all urology practices to reconsider the necessity of face-to-face office encounters. Seeking to reduce patient exposure, our urologic oncology office made an immediate transition to telemedicine and this study reports our experience.

METHODS:

Beginning March 17, 2020 the urologic oncology department committed to see all patients via telemedicine, unless they needed a cystoscopy for high grade urothelial cell carcinoma or recent gross hematuria, or required removal of a Foley catheter or surgical drain. March 17 was assigned day 1, and for the next 14 days rates of face-to-face, audio and audiovisual encounters were recorded. A telephone survey was conducted with all patients who participated in an audiovisual encounter.

RESULTS:

In analyzing the numbers of face-to-face, audio and audiovisual encounters, after day 5 more patients participated in audiovisual encounters than any other modality. By day 10 no nonessential face-to-face encounter occurred. There was an 80.4% response rate to our survey. Average patient account setup time was 10.5 minutes and 35.1% required assistance from our office to set up their account, averaging 7.1 minutes. No-show rates of face-to-face encounters were significantly higher than for audiovisual encounters (face-to-face 67%, audiovisual 17%, p <0.001). Overall 82% of patients surveyed were likely to elect for a telemedicine encounter over a face-to-face encounter for a routine visit during future flu seasons.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current study describes the initial adoption, early clinical experience and patient impressions of rapid implementation of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Urol Pract Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Urol Pract Year: 2020 Document Type: Article