Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Survey of Telehealth Adoption by Neuro-ophthalmologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Benefits, Barriers, and Utility.
Moss, Heather E; Lai, Kevin E; Ko, Melissa W.
  • Moss HE; Departments of Ophthalmology (HEM) and Neurology & Neurological Sciences (HEM), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; Department of Ophthalmology (KEL, MWK), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Ophthalmology Service (KEL), Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; and Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (MWK), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 40(3): 346-355, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-638000
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth modalities have come to prominence as a strategy for providing patient care when in-person care provision opportunities are limited. The degree of adoption by neuro-ophthalmologists has not been quantified.

METHODS:

Telehealth utilization pre-COVID-19 and peri-COVID-19 was surveyed among practicing neuro-ophthalmologists in and outside the United States using an online platform. Demographics, perceived benefits, barriers, and utility for different neuro-ophthalmic conditions were collected. Data collection occurred over a 2-week period in May 2020.

RESULTS:

Two hundred eight practicing neuro-ophthalmologists (81.3% United States, 50.2% females, age range <35 to >65, mode 35-44 years) participated in the survey. Utilization of all telehealth modalities increased from pre-COVID to peri-COVID (video visit 3.9%-68.3%, P < 0.0005, remote interpretation of testing 26.7%-32.2%, P = 0.09, online second opinion 7.9%-15.3%, P = 0.001, and interprofessional e-consult 4.4%-18.7%, P < 0.0005, McNemar). The majority selected access, continuity, and patient efficiency of care as benefits and data quality as a barrier. Telehealth was felt to be most helpful for conditions relying on history, external examination, and previously collected ancillary testing and not helpful for conditions requiring funduscopic examination.

CONCLUSIONS:

Telehealth modality usage by neuro-ophthalmologists increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified benefits have relevance both during and beyond COVID-19. Further work is needed to address barriers in their current and future states to maintain these modalities as viable care delivery options.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Telemedicine / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics / Neurologists / Ophthalmologists / Betacoronavirus / Facilities and Services Utilization Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: J Neuroophthalmol Journal subject: Neurology / Ophthalmology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Telemedicine / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics / Neurologists / Ophthalmologists / Betacoronavirus / Facilities and Services Utilization Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: J Neuroophthalmol Journal subject: Neurology / Ophthalmology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article