Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A systematic review of CT chest in COVID-19 diagnosis and its potential application in a surgical setting.
Shao, J M; Ayuso, S A; Deerenberg, E B; Elhage, S A; Augenstein, V A; Heniford, B T.
  • Shao JM; Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  • Ayuso SA; Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  • Deerenberg EB; Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  • Elhage SA; Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  • Augenstein VA; Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  • Heniford BT; Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(9): 993-1001, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-638013
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of this work was to investigate the sensitivity and utility of CT of the chest in diagnosing active SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) infection, and its potential application to the surgical setting.

METHOD:

A literature review was conducted using Google Scholar® and MEDLINE®/PubMed® to identify current available evidence regarding the sensitivity of CT chest compared with RT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19-positive patients. GRADE criteria and the QUADAS 2 tool were used to assess the level of evidence.

RESULTS:

A total of 20 articles were identified that addressed the question of sensitivity of CT for diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19-positive patients. Overall sensitivity of CT scan ranged from 57%-100% for symptomatic and 46%-100% for asymptomatic COVID-19 patients, while that of RT-PCR ranged from 39%-89%. CT chest was a better diagnostic modality and capable of detecting active infection earlier in the time course of infection than RT-PCR in symptomatic patients. In asymptomatic patients, disease prevalence seems to play a role in the positive predictive value. Minimal evidence exists regarding the sensitivity of CT in patients who are asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS:

In surgical patients, CT chest should be considered as an important adjunct for detection of COVID-19 infection in patients who are symptomatic with negative RT-PCR prior to any operation. For surgical patients who are asymptomatic, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine preoperative CT chest for COVID-19 screening.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Asymptomatic Infections / COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / COVID-19 / Lung Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Codi.15252

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Asymptomatic Infections / COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / COVID-19 / Lung Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Codi.15252