Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Different computed tomography patterns of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) between survivors and non-survivors.
Pan, Feng; Zheng, Chuansheng; Ye, Tianhe; Li, Lingli; Liu, Dehan; Li, Lin; Hesketh, Richard L; Yang, Lian.
  • Pan F; Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jiefang Avenue 1277#, Wuhan, 430022, China.
  • Zheng C; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China.
  • Ye T; Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jiefang Avenue 1277#, Wuhan, 430022, China.
  • Li L; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China.
  • Liu D; Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jiefang Avenue 1277#, Wuhan, 430022, China.
  • Li L; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China.
  • Hesketh RL; Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jiefang Avenue 1277#, Wuhan, 430022, China.
  • Yang L; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 11336, 2020 07 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-638242
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare the chest computed tomography (CT) findings between survivors and non-survivors with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Between 12 January 2020 and 20 February 2020, the records of 124 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into survivor (83/124) and non-survivor (41/124) groups. Chest CT findings were qualitatively compared on admission and serial chest CT scans were semi-quantitively evaluated between two groups using curve estimations. On admission, significantly more bilateral (97.6% vs. 73.5%, p = 0.001) and diffuse lesions (39.0% vs. 8.4%, p < 0.001) with higher total CT score (median 10 vs. 4, p < 0.001) were observed in non-survivor group compared with survivor group. Besides, crazy-paving pattern was more predominant in non-survivor group than survivor group (39.0% vs. 12.0%, p < 0.001). From the prediction of curve estimation, in survivor group total CT score increased in the first 20 days reaching a peak of 6 points and then gradually decreased for more than other 40 days (R2 = 0.545, p < 0.001). In non-survivor group, total CT score rapidly increased over 10 points in the first 10 days and gradually increased afterwards until ARDS occurred with following death events (R2 = 0.711, p < 0.001). In conclusion, persistent progression with predominant crazy-paving pattern was the major manifestation of COVID-19 in non-survivors. Understanding this CT feature could help the clinical physician to predict the prognosis of the patients.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Coronavirus Infections / Lung Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-020-68057-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Coronavirus Infections / Lung Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-020-68057-4