Your browser doesn't support javascript.
COVID-19 Airway Management Isolation Chamber.
Blood, Timothy C; Perkins, Jonathan N; Wistermayer, Paul R; Krivda, Joseph S; Fisher, Nathan T; Riley, Charles A; Ruhl, Douglas S; Hong, Steven S.
  • Blood TC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Perkins JN; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Wistermayer PR; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA.
  • Krivda JS; F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Fisher NT; Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, US Army Medical Research and Development Command, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA.
  • Riley CA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, USA.
  • Ruhl DS; Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Hong SS; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 164(1): 74-81, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-646170
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

During the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), health care workers are innovating patient care and safety measures. Unfortunately, many of these are not properly tested for efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of the novel COVID-19 Airway Management Isolation Chamber (CAMIC) to contain and evacuate particulate. STUDY

DESIGN:

Multi-institutional proof-of-concept study.

SETTING:

Two academic institutions Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) and Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC). SUBJECTS AND

METHODS:

Smoke, saline nebulizer, and simulated working port models were developed to assess the efficacy of the CAMIC to contain and remove ultrafine particles. Particulate counts were collected at set time intervals inside and outside the system.

RESULTS:

With the CAMIC on, smoke particulate counts inside the chamber significantly decreased over time r(18) = -0.88, P < .001, WRNMMC; r(18) = -0.91, P < .001, MAMC. Similarly, saline nebulizer particulate counts inside the chamber significantly decreased over time r(23) = -0.82, P < .001, WRNMMC; r(23) = -0.70, P < .001, MAMC. In the working port model, particulate counts inside the chamber significantly decreased over time r(23) = -0.95, P < .001, WRNMMC; r(23) = -0.85, P < .001, MAMC. No significant leak was detected in the smoke, saline nebulizer, or working port model when the CAMIC was turned on.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CAMIC system appears to provide a barrier that actively removes particles from within the chamber and limits egress. Further studies are necessary to determine clinical applicability. The CAMIC may serve as an adjunct to improve health care worker safety and patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disease Transmission, Infectious / Airway Management / Pandemics / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 0194599820942500

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disease Transmission, Infectious / Airway Management / Pandemics / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Journal subject: Otolaryngology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 0194599820942500