Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Health-Related Quality of Life in Uro-oncologic Patients: What Should We Wait For?
Greco, Francesco; Altieri, Vincenzo M; Esperto, Francesco; Mirone, Vincenzo; Scarpa, Roberto M.
  • Greco F; Department of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: francesco_greco@ymail.com.
  • Altieri VM; Department of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
  • Esperto F; Department of Urology, Campus Biomedico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Mirone V; Department of Urology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
  • Scarpa RM; Department of Urology, Campus Biomedico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 19(2): e63-e68, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-652586
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the health-related quality of life of uro-oncologic patients whose surgery was postponed without being rescheduled during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

From the March 1 to April 26, 2020, major urologic surgeries were drastically reduced at our tertiary-care referral hospital. In order to evaluate health-related quality-of-life outcomes, the SF-36 questionnaire was sent to all patients scheduled for major surgery at our department 3 weeks after the cancellation of the planned surgical procedures because of the COVID-19 emergency.

RESULTS:

All patients included in the analysis had been awaiting surgery for a median (interquartile range) time of 52.85 (35-72) days. The SF-36 questionnaire measured 8 domains physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical health (PH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/fatigue (EF), emotional well-being (EWB), social functioning (SF), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GHP). When considering physical characteristics as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, PF was 91.5 (50-100) and PH was 82.75 (50-100) with a BP of 79.56 (45-90). For emotional and social aspects, RE was 36.83 (0-100) with a SF of 37.98 (12.5-90). Most patients reported loss of energy (EF 35.28 [15-55]) and increased anxiety (EWB 47.18 [interquartile range, 20-75]). All patients perceived a reduction of their health conditions, with GHP of 49.47 (15-85). Generally, 86% of patients (n = 43) noted an almost intact physical function but a significant emotional alteration characterized by a prevalence of anxiety and loss of energy.

CONCLUSION:

The lockdown due to the novel coronavirus that has affected most operating rooms in Italy could be responsible for the increased anxiety and decrement in health status of oncologic patients. Without any effective solution, we should expect a new medical catastrophe-one caused by the increased risk of tumor progression and mortality in uro-oncologic patients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Urologic Surgical Procedures / Urologic Neoplasms / Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Journal subject: Neoplasms / Urology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Urologic Surgical Procedures / Urologic Neoplasms / Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Journal subject: Neoplasms / Urology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article