Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Tocilizumab for severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lan, Shao-Huan; Lai, Chih-Cheng; Huang, Hui-Ting; Chang, Shen-Peng; Lu, Li-Chin; Hsueh, Po-Ren.
  • Lan SH; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Medical Technology, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.
  • Lai CC; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Tainan Branch, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Huang HT; Department of Pharmacy, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Taiwan.
  • Chang SP; Yijia Pharmacy, Tainan 70846, Taiwan.
  • Lu LC; School of Management, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.
  • Hsueh PR; Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: hsporen@nt
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 56(3): 106103, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-664350
ABSTRACT
This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of tocilizumab for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Candidate studies up to 24 May 2020 were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, medRxiv and bioRxiv. Treatment outcomes included mortality, risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and the requirement for mechanical ventilation (MV). Seven retrospective studies involving 592 adult patients with severe COVID-19, including 240 in the tocilizumab group and 352 in the control group, were enrolled. All-cause mortality of severe COVID-19 patients among the tocilizumab group was 16.3% (39/240), which was lower than that in the control group (24.1%; 85/352). However, the difference did not reach statistical significance [risk ratio (RR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-1.22; I2 = 68%]. Additionally, risk of ICU admission was similar between the tocilizumab and control groups (35.1% vs. 15.8%; RR = 1.51, 95% CI 0.33-6.78; I2 = 86%). The requirement for MV was similar between the tocilizumab and control groups (32.4% vs. 28.6%; RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.14-4.94; I2 = 91%). However, these non-significant differences between the tocilizumab and control groups may have been the result of baseline characteristics of the tocilizumab group, which were more severe than those of the control group. Based on low-quality evidence, there is no conclusive evidence that tocilizumab would provide any additional benefit to patients with severe COVID-19. Therefore, further recommendation of tocilizumab for COVID-19 cases should be halted until high-quality evidence from randomised controlled trials is available.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antiviral Agents / Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / Immunologic Factors / Anti-Inflammatory Agents Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.ijantimicag.2020.106103

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antiviral Agents / Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / Immunologic Factors / Anti-Inflammatory Agents Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.ijantimicag.2020.106103