Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Geographical variation in case fatality rate and doubling time during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mazumder, A; Arora, M; Sra, M S; Gupta, A; Behera, P; Gupta, M; Agarwal, M; Rao, A; Mohanta, S S; Parameswaran, G G; Lohiya, A; Shewade, H D.
  • Mazumder A; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Arora M; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Sra MS; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Gupta A; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Behera P; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Gupta M; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Agarwal M; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Rao A; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Mohanta SS; Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, India.
  • Parameswaran GG; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Lohiya A; Super Specialty Cancer Institute and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Shewade HD; International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France.
Epidemiol Infect ; 148: e163, 2020 07 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-679967
ABSTRACT
Case fatality rate (CFR) and doubling time are important characteristics of any epidemic. For coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), wide variations in the CFR and doubling time have been noted among various countries. Early in the epidemic, CFR calculations involving all patients as denominator do not account for the hospitalised patients who are ill and will die in the future. Hence, we calculated cumulative CFR (cCFR) using only patients whose final clinical outcomes were known at a certain time point. We also estimated the daily average doubling time. Calculating CFR using this method leads to temporal stability in the fatality rates, the cCFR stabilises at different values for different countries. The possible reasons for this are an improved outcome rate by the end of the epidemic and a wider testing strategy. The United States, France, Turkey and China had high cCFR at the start due to low outcome rate. By 22 April, Germany, China and South Korea had a low cCFR. China and South Korea controlled the epidemic and achieved high doubling times. The doubling time in Russia did not cross 10 days during the study period.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America / Asia / Europa Language: English Journal: Epidemiol Infect Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Epidemiology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S0950268820001685

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America / Asia / Europa Language: English Journal: Epidemiol Infect Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Epidemiology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S0950268820001685