Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of antiretroviral drugs against SARS, MERS or COVID-19: initial assessment.
Ford, Nathan; Vitoria, Marco; Rangaraj, Ajay; Norris, Susan L; Calmy, Alexandra; Doherty, Meg.
  • Ford N; Department of HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Vitoria M; Department of HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Rangaraj A; Department of HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Norris SL; Science Division, Quality of Norms and Standards Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Calmy A; HIV/AIDS Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Doherty M; Department of HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Int AIDS Soc ; 23(4): e25489, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-68729
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Several antiretroviral drugs are being considered for the treatment of COVID-19, the disease caused by a newly identified coronavirus, (SARS-CoV-2). We systematically reviewed the clinical outcomes of using antiretroviral drugs for the prevention and treatment of coronaviruses and planned clinical trials.

METHODS:

Three databases were screened from inception to 30 March 2020 for studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients with SARS, MERS or COVID-19 treated with antiretrovirals.

RESULTS:

From an initial screen of 433 titles, two randomized trials and 24 observational studies provided clinical outcome data on the use of antiretroviral drugs; most studies reported outcomes using LPV/r as treatment. Of the 21 observational studies reporting treatment outcomes, there were three studies among patients with SARS, six studies among patients with MERS and 12 studies among patients with COVID-19. In one randomized trial 99 patients with severe COVID-19 illness were randomized to receive LPV/r (400/100 mg twice a day) and 100 patients to standard of care for 14 days LPV/r was not associated with a statistically significant difference in time to clinical improvement, although LPV/r given within 12 days of symptoms was associated with shorter time to clinical improvement; 28 day mortality was numerically lower in the LPV/r group (14/99) compared to the control group (25/100), but this difference was not statistically significant. The second trial found no benefit. The certainty of the evidence for the randomized trials was low. In the observational studies 3 out of 361 patients who received LPV/r died; the certainty of evidence was very low. Three studies reported a possible protective effect of LPV/r as post-exposure prophylaxis. Again, the certainty of the evidence was very low due to uncertainty due to limited sample size.

CONCLUSIONS:

On the basis of the available evidence it is uncertain whether LPV/r and other antiretrovirals improve clinical outcomes or prevent infection among patients at high risk of acquiring COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Coronavirus / Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Journal subject: SINDROME DA IMUNODEFICIENCIA ADQUIRIDA (AIDS) Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jia2.25489

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Coronavirus / Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Journal subject: SINDROME DA IMUNODEFICIENCIA ADQUIRIDA (AIDS) Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jia2.25489