Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Optimal size of sample pooling for RNA pool testing: An avant-garde for scaling up severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 testing.
Khodare, Arvind; Padhi, Abhishek; Gupta, Ekta; Agarwal, Reshu; Dubey, Shantanu; Sarin, Shiv Kumar.
  • Khodare A; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Padhi A; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Gupta E; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Agarwal R; Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Dubey S; Department of Hospital Administration, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Sarin SK; Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 38(1): 18-23, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-688890
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Timely diagnosis is essential for the containment of the disease and breaks in the chain of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The present situation demands the countries to scale up their testing and design innovative strategies to conserve diagnostic kits and reagents. The pooling of samples saves time, workforce and most importantly diagnostic kits and reagents. In the present study, we tried to define the pool size that could be applied with acceptable confidence for testing. Materials and

Methods:

We used repeatedly tested positive clinical sample elutes having different levels of SARS CoV 2 RNA and negative sample elutes to prepare seven series of 11 pools each, having pool sizes ranging from 2 to 48 samples to estimate the optimal pool size. Each pool had one positive sample elute in different compositions. All the pools were tested by SARS CoV 2 reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Results:

Out of the 77 pools, only 53 (68.8%) were found positive. The sensitivity of pools of 2-48 samples was decreased from 100% (95% confidence interval [CL]; 98.4-100) to 41.41% (95% CL; 34.9-48.1). The maximum size of the pool with acceptable sensitivity (>95%) was found to be of six samples. For the pool size of six samples, the sensitivity was 97.8% and the efficiency of pooling was 0.38.

Conclusions:

The pooling of samples is a practical way for scaling up testing and ultimately containing the further spread of the CoV disease 2019 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Specimen Handling / Coronavirus Infections / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / Betacoronavirus Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Indian J Med Microbiol Journal subject: Microbiology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijmm.IJMM_20_260

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Specimen Handling / Coronavirus Infections / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / Betacoronavirus Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Indian J Med Microbiol Journal subject: Microbiology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijmm.IJMM_20_260