Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19.
Pare, Joseph R; Camelo, Ingrid; Mayo, Kelly C; Leo, Megan M; Dugas, Julianne N; Nelson, Kerrie P; Baker, William E; Shareef, Faizah; Mitchell, Patricia M; Schechter-Perkins, Elissa M.
  • Pare JR; Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Camelo I; Boston Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Mayo KC; Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Leo MM; Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Dugas JN; Boston Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Nelson KP; Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Baker WE; Boston Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Shareef F; Boston Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Mitchell PM; Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Schechter-Perkins EM; Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(4): 771-778, 2020 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-690943
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Current recommendations for diagnostic imaging for moderately to severely ill patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include chest radiograph (CXR). Our primary objective was to determine whether lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines, when excluding patients with alternative etiologies for B-lines, are more sensitive for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19 than CXR.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who presented to a single, academic emergency department in the United States between March 20 and April 6, 2020, and received LUS, CXR, and viral testing for COVID-19 as part of their diagnostic evaluation. The primary objective was to estimate the test characteristics of both LUS B-lines and CXR for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients with COVID-19 that have secondary LUS findings of pleural abnormalities and subpleural consolidations.

RESULTS:

We identified 43 patients who underwent both LUS and CXR and were tested for COVID-19. Of these, 27/43 (63%) tested positive. LUS was more sensitive (88.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 71.1-97.0) for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19 than CXR (51.9%, 95% CI, 34.0-69.3; p = 0.013). LUS and CXR specificity were 56.3% (95% CI, 33.2-76.9) and 75.0% (95% CI, 50.0-90.3), respectively (p = 0.453). Secondary LUS findings of patients with COVID-19 demonstrated 21/27 (77.8%) had pleural abnormalities and 10/27 (37%) had subpleural consolidations.

CONCLUSION:

Among patients who underwent LUS and CXR, LUS was found to have a higher sensitivity than CXR for the evaluation of COVID-19. This data could have important implications as an aid in the diagnostic evaluation of COVID-19, particularly where viral testing is not available or restricted. If generalizable, future directions would include defining how to incorporate LUS into clinical management and its role in screening lower-risk populations.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Ultrasonography / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus / Lung Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: West J Emerg Med Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Ultrasonography / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus / Lung Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: West J Emerg Med Year: 2020 Document Type: Article