Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by Mass Spectrometry.
Wandernoth, Petra; Kriegsmann, Katharina; Groh-Mohanu, Cristina; Daeumer, Martin; Gohl, Peter; Harzer, Oliver; Kriegsmann, Mark; Kriegsmann, Joerg.
  • Wandernoth P; Center for Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany.
  • Kriegsmann K; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Groh-Mohanu C; Center for Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany.
  • Daeumer M; Kaiserslautern Medical Laboratory, Institute of Immunology and Genetics, 67655 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
  • Gohl P; Bioscientia, 576080 Ingelheim, Germany.
  • Harzer O; Bioscientia, 576080 Ingelheim, Germany.
  • Kriegsmann M; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kriegsmann J; German Center for Lung Cancer Research (DZL), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Viruses ; 12(8)2020 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-693300
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Amplification of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the gold standard to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since the initial outbreak, strategies to detect and isolate patients have been important to avoid uncontrolled viral spread. Although testing capacities have been upscaled, there is still a need for reliable high throughput test systems, specifically those that require alternative consumables. Therefore, we tested and compared two different methods for the detection of viral PCR products rRT-PCR and mass spectrometry (MS).

METHODS:

Viral RNA was isolated and amplified from oro- or nasopharyngeal swabs. A total of 22 samples that tested positive and 22 samples that tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR were analyzed by MS. Results of the rRT-PCR and the MS protocol were compared.

RESULTS:

Results of rRT-PCR and the MS test system were in concordance in all samples. Time-to-results was faster for rRT-PCR. Hands-on-time was comparable in both assays.

CONCLUSIONS:

MS is a fast, reliable and cost-effective alternative for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from oral and nasopharyngeal swabs.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Mass Spectrometry / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus Type of study: Diagnostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: V12080849

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Mass Spectrometry / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus Type of study: Diagnostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: V12080849