Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Disability inclusiveness of government responses to COVID-19 in South America: a framework analysis study.
Sakellariou, Dikaios; Malfitano, Ana Paula Serrata; Rotarou, Elena S.
  • Sakellariou D; School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Eastgate House, Newport Road 35-43, Cardiff, CF24 0AB, UK. sakellarioud@cardiff.ac.uk.
  • Malfitano APS; Department of Occupational Therapy, Postgraduate Program in Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal do São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
  • Rotarou ES; Faculty of Medicine and Science, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Int J Equity Health ; 19(1): 131, 2020 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-706957
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Disabled people are particularly exposed to the risks of COVID-19, as well as to the measures taken to address it, and their impact. The aim of the study was to examine the disability-inclusiveness of government responses to COVID-19 in four South American Countries Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Peru.

METHODS:

We conducted documentary research, using framework analysis to analyse reports, legislation, decrees, and other official documents that communicated measures taken in response to the pandemic, published from February 1st until May 22nd, 2020. We included documents reporting measures that affected disabled people either directly (measures specifically designed for disabled people) or indirectly (measures for the general population). We developed an analytical framework based on recommendations for disability-inclusive response to COVID-19 published by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Carribean, the World Health Organisation, and other international organisations.

RESULTS:

We analysed 72 documents. The findings highlight that while some positive measures were taken, the needs of disabled people were not fully considered. Several countries published recommendations for a disability-inclusive response to COVID-19, without ensuring their translation to practice. All countries took at least some steps to ensure access to financial support, health, and education for disabled people, but at the same time they also implemented policies that had a detrimental impact on disabled people. The populations that are most exposed to the impacts of COVID-19, including disabled people living in institutional care, were protected in several cases only by recommendations rather by legislation.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study illustrates how the official government responses taken by four countries in the region - while positive, in several aspects - do not fully address the needs of disabled people, thus further disadvantaging them. In order to ensure response to COVID - 19 is disability inclusive, it is necessary to translate recommendations to practice, consider disabled people both in mainstream policy and in disability-specific measures, and focus on the long-term reconstruction phase.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Disabled Persons / Coronavirus Infections / Policy / Pandemics / Government Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: South America Language: English Journal: Int J Equity Health Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12939-020-01244-x

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Disabled Persons / Coronavirus Infections / Policy / Pandemics / Government Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: South America Language: English Journal: Int J Equity Health Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12939-020-01244-x