Your browser doesn't support javascript.
[Point-of-care testing: place of France in the world National survey in healthcare establisments in 2019]. / Examens de biologie médicale délocalisée : place de la France dans le monde Enquête nationale en 2019 dans les établissements de santé.
Beauvieux, Marie-Christine; Bost, Erika; Castaing-Mouhica, Gladys; Terral, Catherine; Berthon, Nathalie; Martinel, Isabelle; Chauzit, Emmanuelle.
  • Beauvieux MC; Cellule de biologie délocalisée, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, Résonance magnétique des systèmes biologiques, UM5536 CNRS Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Bost E; Cellule de biologie délocalisée, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Castaing-Mouhica G; Cellule de biologie délocalisée, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Terral C; Cellule de biologie délocalisée, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Berthon N; Cellule de biologie délocalisée, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Martinel I; Cellule qualité, Pôle de biologie et pathologie, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Chauzit E; Cellule qualité, Pôle de biologie et pathologie, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 78(4): 363-382, 2020 08 01.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-709296
ABSTRACT
The point-of-care tests (POCT) are subject to accreditation. A national inventory survey provides a synthesis of knowledge. The survey distributed 31 questions in 2019. 147 responses were received (75% biologists, 49% CHU, 42% CHG). Only 20.41% are accredited ISO22870, the majority for <50% of the medical departments; 70% say they are going there at the end of 2019 or in 2020. The maps are unknown for 32% (EBMD) and 82% (TROD). Visibility is poor with medical establishment committee (40%), IT department (31%). Connection is necessary for 87-95% depending on the criterion (QC, authorizations, etc.) and 66% of answers highlight that less than 50% of connexion is effective. The major advantage is the delay of the result (62.5%), then the relationship with the health teams (33.3%). The disadvantages difficulty of the quality approach (45%), cost of tests (34.3%). Human resource requirements are identified for technicians (82%) and biologists (76%). The multiplicity of sites, devices and operators means that it is difficult to set up and maintain. Biology outside the laboratories, under biological responsibility, must meet a rigorous imperative quality approach.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Global Health / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Point-of-Care Testing / Laboratories Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: French Journal: Ann Biol Clin (Paris) Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Abc.2020.1572

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Global Health / Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Point-of-Care Testing / Laboratories Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: French Journal: Ann Biol Clin (Paris) Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Abc.2020.1572