Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Development and Evaluation of Novel and Highly Sensitive Single-Tube Nested Real-Time RT-PCR Assays for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.
Yip, Cyril Chik-Yan; Sridhar, Siddharth; Leung, Kit-Hang; Ng, Anthony Chin-Ki; Chan, Kwok-Hung; Chan, Jasper Fuk-Woo; Tsang, Owen Tak-Yin; Hung, Ivan Fan-Ngai; Cheng, Vincent Chi-Chung; Yuen, Kwok-Yung; To, Kelvin Kai-Wang.
  • Yip CC; Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Sridhar S; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Leung KH; State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Ng AC; Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Chan KH; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Chan JF; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Tsang OT; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Hung IF; State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Cheng VC; Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Yuen KY; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • To KK; State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(16)2020 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-714483
ABSTRACT
Sensitive molecular assays are critical for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis. Here, we designed and evaluated two single-tube nested (STN) real-time RT-PCR assays, targeting SARS-CoV-2 RdRp/Hel and N genes. Both STN assays had a low limit of detection and did not cross react with other human coronaviruses and respiratory viruses. Using 213 initial respiratory specimens from suspected COVID-19 patients, the sensitivity of both the STN COVID-19-RdRp/Hel and the STN COVID-19-N assays was 100% (99/99), while that of the comparator non-nested N assay was 95% (94/99). Among 108 follow-up specimens from confirmed COVID-19 patients who tested negative by the non-nested COVID-19-RdRp/Hel assay, 28 (25.9%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by the STN COVID-19-RdRp/Hel or the STN COVID-19-N assay. To evaluate the performance of our novel STN assays in pooled specimens, we created four sample pools, with each pool consisting of one low positive specimen and 49 negative specimens. While the non-nested COVID-19-RdRp/Hel assay was positive in only one of four sample pools (25%), both of the STN assays were positive in two of four samples pools (50%). In conclusion, the STN assays are highly sensitive and specific for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Their boosted sensitivity offers advantages in non-traditional COVID-19 testing algorithms such as saliva screening and pooled sample screening during massive screening.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / Betacoronavirus Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijms21165674

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / Betacoronavirus Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijms21165674