Your browser doesn't support javascript.
No Statistically Apparent Difference in Antiviral Effectiveness Observed Among Ribavirin Plus Interferon-Alpha, Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Interferon-Alpha, and Ribavirin Plus Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Interferon-Alpha in Patients With Mild to Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019: Results of a Randomized, Open-Labeled Prospective Study.
Huang, Yin-Qiu; Tang, Sheng-Quan; Xu, Xiao-Lei; Zeng, Yan-Ming; He, Xiao-Qing; Li, Yao; Harypursat, Vijay; Lu, Yan-Qiu; Wan, Yan; Zhang, Lu; Sun, Qiang-Zhong; Sun, Nan-Nan; Wang, Gui-Xue; Yang, Zhong-Ping; Chen, Yao-Kai.
  • Huang YQ; National Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Tang SQ; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Xu XL; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Zeng YM; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • He XQ; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Li Y; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Harypursat V; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Lu YQ; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Wan Y; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Zhang L; Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Sun QZ; Division of Tuberculosis, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Sun NN; Division of Tuberculosis, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Wang GX; School of Biological Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
  • Yang ZP; National Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
  • Chen YK; National Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Front Pharmacol ; 11: 1071, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-726004
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Currently, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread globally, causing an unprecedented pandemic. However, there is no specific antiviral therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of three antiviral treatment regimens in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.

METHODS:

This was a single-center, randomized, open-labeled, prospective clinical trial. Eligible patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 were randomized into three groups ribavirin (RBV) plus interferon-α (IFN-α), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus IFN-α, and RBV plus LPV/r plus IFN-α at a 111 ratio. Each patient was invited to participate in a 28-d follow-up after initiation of an antiviral regimen. The outcomes include the difference in median interval to SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negativity, the proportion of patients with SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negativity at day 14, the mortality at day 28, the proportion of patients re-classified as severe cases, and adverse events during the study period.

RESULTS:

In total, we enrolled 101 patients in this study. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients were comparable among the three groups. In the analysis of intention-to-treat data, the median interval from baseline to SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negativity was 12 d in the LPV/r+IFN-α-treated group, as compared with 13 and 15 d in the RBV+IFN-α-treated group and in the RBV+LPV/r+ IFN-α-treated group, respectively (p=0.23). The proportion of patients with SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negativity in the LPV/r+IFN-α-treated group (61.1%) was higher than the RBV+ IFN-α-treated group (51.5%) and the RBV+LPV/r+IFN-α-treated group (46.9%) at day 14; however, the difference between these groups was calculated to be statistically insignificant. The RBV+LPV/r+IFN-α-treated group developed a significantly higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events than the LPV/r+ IFN-α-treated group and the RBV+ IFN-α-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results indicate that there are no significant differences among the three regimens in terms of antiviral effectiveness in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Furthermore, the combination of RBV and LPV/r is associated with a significant increase in gastrointestinal adverse events, suggesting that RBV and LPV/r should not be co-administered to COVID-19 patients simultaneously. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION www.ClinicalTrials.gov, ID ChiCTR2000029387. Registered on January 28, 2019.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Front Pharmacol Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fphar.2020.01071

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Front Pharmacol Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fphar.2020.01071