Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasonography in Older Nursing Home Residents Affected by COVID-19.
Veronese, Nicola; Sbrogiò, Luca Gino; Valle, Roberto; Marin, Laura; Boscolo Fiore, Elena; Tiozzo, Andrea.
  • Veronese N; Primary Care Department, Azienda ULSS 3 (Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria) "Serenissima", Veneto Region, Italy. Electronic address: ilmannato@gmail.com.
  • Sbrogiò LG; Department of Prevention, Azienda ULSS 3 (Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria) "Serenissima", Veneto Region, Italy.
  • Valle R; Cardiology Department, Ospedale Madonna della Navicella, Azienda ULSS 3 (Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria) "Serenissima", Veneto Region, Italy.
  • Marin L; Primary Care Department, Azienda ULSS 3 (Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria) "Serenissima", Veneto Region, Italy.
  • Boscolo Fiore E; "Felice Fortunato Casson" Nursing Home, Chioggia, Venice, Italy.
  • Tiozzo A; Emergency Department, Ospedale Madonna della Navicella, Azienda ULSS 3 (Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria) "Serenissima", Primary Care Department, Veneto Region, Italy.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 21(10): 1384-1386, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-744077
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Lung ultrasonographic (LUS) imaging may play an important role in the management of patients with COVID-19-associated lung injury, particularly in some special populations. However, data regarding the prognostic role of the LUS in nursing home residents, one of the populations most affected by COVID-19, are not still available.

DESIGN:

Retrospective. SETTINGS AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Nursing home residents affected by COVID-19 were followed up with an LUS from April 8 to May 14, 2020, in Chioggia, Venice.

METHODS:

COVID-19 was diagnosed through a nasopharyngeal swab. LUS results were scored using a 12-zone method. For each of the 12 zones (2 posterior, 2 anterior, 2 lateral, for both left and right lungs), the possible score ranged from 0 to 3 (1 = presence of B lines, separated, with <50% of space from the pleural line; 2 = presence of B lines, separated, with >50% of space from the pleural line; 3 = lung thickening with tissuelike aspect). The total score ranged from 0 to 36. Mortality was assessed using administrative data. Data regarding accuracy (and related parameters) were reported.

RESULTS:

Among 175 nursing home residents, 48 (mean age 84.1 years; mainly female) were affected by COVID-19. Twelve died during the follow-up period. The mean LUS score was 3. The area under the curve of LUS in predicting mortality was 0.603 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.419-0.787], and it increased to 0.725 (95% CI 0.41-0.99) after including follow-up LUS controls. Taking an LUS score ≥4 as exposure variable and mortality as outcome, the sensitivity was 58.33% and specificity 63.89%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.62 and a negative of 0.65. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS LUS is able to significantly predict mortality in nursing home residents affected by COVID-19, suggesting that this simple tool can be routinely used in this setting instead of more invasive techniques available only in hospital.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus / Lung / Nursing Homes Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Journal subject: History of Medicine / Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Betacoronavirus / Lung / Nursing Homes Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Journal subject: History of Medicine / Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article