Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of respiratory protective devices on respiration: Implications for panic vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Perna, Giampaolo; Cuniberti, Francesco; Daccò, Silvia; Nobile, Maria; Caldirola, Daniela.
  • Perna G; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Villa San Benedetto Menni Hospital, Hermanas Hospitalarias, Via Roma 16, 22032 Albese con Cassano, Como, Italy. Electronic address: giampaolo
  • Cuniberti F; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Villa San Benedetto Menni Hospital, Hermanas Hospitalarias, Via Roma 16, 22032 Albese con Cassano, Como, Italy.
  • Daccò S; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Villa San Benedetto Menni Hospital, Hermanas Hospitalarias, Via Roma 16, 22032 Albese con Cassano, Como, Italy.
  • Nobile M; Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini 23842, Lecco, Italy.
  • Caldirola D; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Villa San Benedetto Menni Hospital, Hermanas Hospitalarias, Via Roma 16, 22032 Albese con Cassano, Como, Italy.
J Affect Disord ; 277: 772-778, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-746017
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The wearing of respiratory protective devices (RPDs) correctly and continually in situations where people are at risk of respiratory infections is crucial for infection prevention. Certain people are poorly compliant with RPDs due to RPD-related annoyance, including respiratory discomfort. We hypothesized that individuals vulnerable to panic attacks are included in this group. No published studies on this topic are available. The evidence for our hypothesis was reviewed in this study as a starting point for future research.

METHODS:

We selected a set of experimental studies that measured the respiratory physiological burden in RPD wearers through objective and validated methods. We conducted a bibliographic search of publications in the PubMed database (January 2000-May 2020) to identify representative studies that may be of interest for panic respiratory pathophysiology.

RESULTS:

Five studies were included. Wearing RPDs exerted significant respiratory effects, including increased breathing resistance, CO2 rebreathing due to CO2 accumulation in the RPD cavity, and decreased inhaled O2 concentration. We discussed the implications of these effects on the respiratory pathophysiology of panic.

LIMITATIONS:

Most studies had a small sample size, with a preponderance of young participants. Different methodologies were used across the studies. Furthermore, differences in physical responses between wearing RPDs in experimental settings or daily life cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS:

This research supports the idea that panic-prone individuals may be at higher risk of respiratory discomfort when wearing RPDs, thereby reducing their tolerance for these devices. Strategies to decrease discomfort should be identified to overcome the risk of poor compliance.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Respiration / Respiration Disorders / Respiratory Protective Devices / Panic Disorder / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Affect Disord Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Respiration / Respiration Disorders / Respiratory Protective Devices / Panic Disorder / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Affect Disord Year: 2020 Document Type: Article