Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab.
Manalac, Justin; Yee, Jennifer; Calayag, Kyle; Nguyen, Linda; Patel, Payal M; Zhou, Daniel; Shi, Run-Zhang.
  • Manalac J; Clinical Chemistry and Immunology Section of Clinical Laboratories, Stanford Health Care, United States.
  • Yee J; Clinical Chemistry and Immunology Section of Clinical Laboratories, Stanford Health Care, United States.
  • Calayag K; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States.
  • Nguyen L; Clinical Chemistry and Immunology Section of Clinical Laboratories, Stanford Health Care, United States.
  • Patel PM; Clinical Chemistry and Immunology Section of Clinical Laboratories, Stanford Health Care, United States.
  • Zhou D; Clinical Chemistry and Immunology Section of Clinical Laboratories, Stanford Health Care, United States.
  • Shi RZ; Clinical Chemistry and Immunology Section of Clinical Laboratories, Stanford Health Care, United States; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: rzshi@stanford.edu.
Clin Chim Acta ; 510: 687-690, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-747275
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We report our findings of test performance especially specificity of a fully automated Abbott Architect anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgA/IgG in human plasma.

METHODS:

We used positive cohort of 97 samples from Covid-19 patients or healthcare workers, collected at late time points from symptom onsets. We also included another cohort of 215 samples as negative controls, 78 of which had positive serology test results of other infectious diseases or autoimmunity. Assay specificity was assessed by using a total of 847 anonymized samples which were collected before the Covid-19 pandemic from local patient populations seeking clinical care for rheumatoid diseases, thyroid cancer, and therapeutic drug monitoring.

RESULTS:

Abbott IgG, Euroimmun IgG/IgA had high precision, demonstrated by both intra- and inter-day CVs of <2%. There was no Abbott or Euroimmun IgG assay cross reactivity in the 78 samples with positive serology of non-SARS-CoV-2 infectious diseases and positive autoimmune antibodies. The Abbott IgG has specificity of 99.6%, while Euroimmun IgG and IgA were as high as 91.5% and 71.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our evaluation confirmed high specificity of the Abbott IgG assay, while it was lower for Euroimmun IgG. Euroimmun IgA has suboptimal specificity which may limit its clinical use. Assay sensitivity was high for both Abbott and Euroimmun IgG assays.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoglobulin A / Immunoglobulin G / Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / Betacoronavirus / Luminescent Measurements Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Chim Acta Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.cca.2020.09.002

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoglobulin A / Immunoglobulin G / Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / Betacoronavirus / Luminescent Measurements Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Chim Acta Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.cca.2020.09.002