Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Feasibility of using point-of-care lung ultrasound for early triage of COVID-19 patients in the emergency room.
Narinx, Nick; Smismans, Annick; Symons, Rolf; Frans, Johan; Demeyere, Annick; Gillis, Marc.
  • Narinx N; Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. nick.narinx@student.kuleuven.be.
  • Smismans A; Department of Microbiology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
  • Symons R; Department of Radiology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
  • Frans J; Department of Microbiology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
  • Demeyere A; Department of Radiology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
  • Gillis M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
Emerg Radiol ; 27(6): 663-670, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-754460
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Diagnostic value of point-of-care lung ultrasound (POCUS) in detection of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in an emergency setting is currently unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare diagnostic performance, in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, of POCUS lung, chest CT, and RT-PCR for clinically suspected COVID-19 infections in patients submitting to the emergency room (ER). MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

This retrospective study enrolled 93 patients with a suspected COVID-19 infection, admitted to the ER between March 28th and April 20th, 2020. Test subjects showed one or more symptoms of an acute respiratory infection, for which consequent COVID-19 testing was achieved using POCUS lung, chest CT, and RT-PCR. CT images were analyzed by 2 radiologists blinded to RT-PCR results. POCUS lung was performed by three emergency medical doctors, and reports were analyzed by the researcher, blinded to clinical information, US imaging, CT, and RT-PCR test results.

RESULTS:

Compared with RT-PCR, POCUS lung demonstrated outstanding sensitivity and NPV (93.3% and 94.1% respectively) while showing poor values for specificity, PPV, and accuracy (21.3%, 19.2%, and 33.3% respectively). In contrast, similar inquiries using chest CT as index test, excellent sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and accuracy (80.0%, 86.7%, 95.6%, and 85.6%, respectively) were reported, beside a moderate value for PPV (54.5%).

CONCLUSION:

POCUS may provide early ER triage with a useful, rapid, low-threshold, and safe screening tool in evaluating possible COVID-19 infections. Due to limited specificity, suggestive POCUS lung findings should be confirmed with RT-PCR or chest CT.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Triage / Coronavirus Infections / Point-of-Care Systems / Emergency Service, Hospital Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Emerg Radiol Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10140-020-01849-3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Triage / Coronavirus Infections / Point-of-Care Systems / Emergency Service, Hospital Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Emerg Radiol Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10140-020-01849-3