Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Quantifying Aerosolization of Facial Plastic Surgery Procedures in the COVID-19 Era: Safety and Particle Generation in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma and Rhinoplasty.
Gadkaree, Shekhar K; Derakhshan, Adeeb; Workman, Alan D; Feng, Allen L; Quesnel, Alicia M; Shaye, David A.
  • Gadkaree SK; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Derakhshan A; Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Workman AD; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Feng AL; Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Quesnel AM; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Shaye DA; Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med ; 2020 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-759892
ABSTRACT

Background:

COVID-19 poses a potentially significant infectious risk during procedures of the head and neck due to high viral loads in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx. Facial plastic surgery has significant exposure to these areas during craniomaxillofacial trauma procedures and rhinoplasty.

Methods:

Airborne particulate generation in the 1-10 µm range was quantified with an optical particle sizer in real time during cadaveric-simulated rhinoplasty and facial trauma conditions. Procedures tested included mandibular plate screw drilling, calvarial drilling, nasal bone osteotomy, nasal dorsal rasping, and piezoelectric saw use. Particulate generation was measured both adjacent to the surgical site and at surgeon mouth level (SML).

Results:

Mandibular plate screw drilling without irrigation generated significant particulate both adjacent to the surgical site and at SML (p < 0.01). Irrigation mitigated particulate generation at SML to nonsignificant levels. Calvarial drilling additionally produced substantial particulate above baseline adjacent to the surgical site (p < 0.01). Standard nasal osteotomies and dorsal rasping did not generate detectable airborne particulate, whereas piezoelectric saw use was associated with significant particulate generation both adjacent to the surgical site (p < 0.001) and at SML (p < 0.01). At SML, smaller particulate represented a significantly higher proportion of total particulate detected.

Conclusions:

The majority of craniomaxillofacial trauma procedures involve particle generation that may be limited in spread by the use of local irrigation. Most bony work involved in rhinoplasty can be safely performed without a high degree of particle formation. The use of piezoelectric instruments in rhinoplasty should be avoided when concerned for particulate generation.

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fpsam.2020.0322

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fpsam.2020.0322