Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Performance of Two Risk-Stratification Models in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease.
Xu, Rong; Hou, Keke; Zhang, Kun; Xu, Huayan; Zhang, Na; Fu, Hang; Xie, Linjun; Sun, Ran; Wen, Lingyi; Liu, Hui; Yang, Zhigang; Yang, Ming; Guo, Yingkun.
  • Xu R; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Hou K; Department of Radiology, Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
  • Zhang K; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Xu H; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Zhang N; Department of Radiology, Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
  • Fu H; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Xie L; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Sun R; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Wen L; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Liu H; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Yang Z; Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Yang M; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
  • Guo Y; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 518, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-760866
ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite an increase in the familiarity of the medical community with the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there is presently a lack of rapid and effective risk stratification indicators to predict the poor clinical outcomes of COVID-19 especially in severe patients.

Methods:

In this retrospective single-center study, we included 117 cases confirmed with COVID-19. The clinical, laboratory, and imaging features were collected and analyzed during admission. The Multi-lobular infiltration, hypo-Lymphocytosis, Bacterial coinfection, Smoking history, hyper-Tension and Age (MuLBSTA) Score and Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, Age 65 (CURB65) score were used to assess the death and intensive care unit (ICU) risks in all patients.

Results:

Among of all 117 hospitalized patients, 21 (17.9%) patients were admitted to the ICU care, and 5 (4.3%) patients were died. The median hospital stay was 12 (10-15) days. There were 18 patients with MuLBSTA score ≥ 12 points and were all of severe type. In severe type, ICU care and death patients, the proportion with MuLBSTA ≥ 12 points were greater than that of CURB65 score ≥ 3 points (severe type patients, 50 vs. 27.8%; ICU care, 61.9 vs. 19.0%; death, 100 vs. 40%). For the MuLBSTA score, the ROC curve showed good efficiency of diagnosis death (area under the curve [AUC], 0.956; cutoff value, 12; specificity, 89.5%; sensitivity, 100%) and ICU care (AUC, 0.875; cutoff value, 11; specificity, 91.7%; sensitivity, 71.4%). The K-M survival analysis showed that patients with MuLBSTA score ≥ 12 had higher risk of ICU (log-rank, P = 0.001) and high risk of death (log-rank, P = 0.000).

Conclusions:

The MuLBSTA score is valuable for risk stratification and could effectively screen high-risk patients at admission. The higher score at admission have higher risk of ICU care and death in patients infected with COVID.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmed.2020.00518

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmed.2020.00518