Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Drug-drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants associated with adverse events in the real world: A systematic review.
Li, Allen; Li, Ming K; Crowther, Mark; Vazquez, Sara R.
  • Li A; University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Electronic address: lia59@mcmaster.ca.
  • Li MK; University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: mingml.li@mail.utoronto.ca.
  • Crowther M; Division of Hematology & Thromboembolism, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: crowthrm@mcmaster.ca.
  • Vazquez SR; Department of Pharmacy Services, Thrombosis Service, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: Sara.vazquez@hsc.utah.edu.
Thromb Res ; 194: 240-245, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-776618
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as safe and effective alternatives to Vitamin-K antagonists for treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thrombosis. Due to their novelty, pharmacokinetic DOAC drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that result in clinical adverse events have not been well-documented.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to systematically review reported pharmacokinetic DDIs resulting in clinical adverse events through documented observational evidence to better inform clinicians in clinical practice.

METHODS:

A comprehensive literature review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar was conducted through March 10th, 2020. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from eligible articles according to pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles reporting bleeding or thrombotic outcomes in non-controlled (observational) settings resulting from suggested pharmacokinetic DOAC DDIs were included.

RESULTS:

A total of 5567 citations were reviewed, of which 24 were included following data extraction. The majority were case reports (n = 21) documenting a single adverse event resulting from a suspected DOAC DDI, while the remaining papers were a case series (n = 1) and cohort studies (n = 2). The most commonly reported interacting drugs were amiodarone and ritonavir (bleeding), and phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine (thrombosis). Bleeding events more often resulted from a combined mechanism (P-glycoprotein AND CYP3A4 inhibition), whereas thrombotic events resulted from either combined OR single P-glycoprotein/CYP3A4 induction.

CONCLUSION:

Current literature evaluating the real-world risk of DOAC DDIs is limited to few case reports and retrospective observational analyses. Clinicians are encouraged to continue to report suspected drug interactions resulting in adverse events.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmaceutical Preparations / Anticoagulants Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Thromb Res Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmaceutical Preparations / Anticoagulants Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Thromb Res Year: 2020 Document Type: Article