Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A laboratory-based study examining the properties of silk fabric to evaluate its potential as a protective barrier for personal protective equipment and as a functional material for face coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Parlin, Adam F; Stratton, Samuel M; Culley, Theresa M; Guerra, Patrick A.
  • Parlin AF; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Stratton SM; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Culley TM; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
  • Guerra PA; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0239531, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-781673
ABSTRACT
The worldwide shortage of single-use N95 respirators and surgical masks due to the COVID-19 pandemic has forced many health care personnel to use their existing equipment for as long as possible. In many cases, workers cover respirators with available masks in an attempt to extend their effectiveness against the virus. Due to low mask supplies, many people instead are using face coverings improvised from common fabrics. Our goal was to determine what fabrics would be most effective in both practices. Under laboratory conditions, we examined the hydrophobicity of fabrics (cotton, polyester, silk), as measured by their resistance to the penetration of small and aerosolized water droplets, an important transmission avenue for the virus causing COVID-19. We also examined the breathability of these fabrics and their ability to maintain hydrophobicity despite undergoing repeated cleaning. Laboratory-based tests were conducted when fabrics were fashioned as an overlaying barrier for respirators and when constructed as face coverings. When used as material in these two situations, silk was more effective at impeding the penetration and absorption of droplets due to its greater hydrophobicity relative to other tested fabrics. We found that silk face coverings repelled droplets in spray tests as well as disposable single-use surgical masks, and silk face coverings have the added advantage over masks such that they can be sterilized for immediate reuse. We show that silk is a hydrophobic barrier to droplets, can be more breathable than other fabrics that trap humidity, and are re-useable via cleaning. We suggest that silk can serve as an effective material for making hydrophobic barriers that protect respirators, and silk can now be tested under clinical conditions to verify its efficacy for this function. Although respirators are still the most appropriate form of protection, silk face coverings possess properties that make them capable of repelling droplets.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Textiles / Coronavirus Infections / Silk / Pandemics / Personal Protective Equipment / Betacoronavirus / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0239531

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Textiles / Coronavirus Infections / Silk / Pandemics / Personal Protective Equipment / Betacoronavirus / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0239531