Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prevalence of depression during the SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 pandemics: A protocol for overview of systematic reviews.
Du, Li; Chen, Ya-Min; Li, Ying; Yuan, Wei; Wang, Jian-Shu.
  • Du L; The Third People's Hospital of Lanzhou City.
  • Chen YM; Evidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University.
  • Li Y; Department of Obstetrics, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University.
  • Yuan W; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University.
  • Wang JS; Department of bone and soft tissue oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(38): e22235, 2020 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-787426
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, has emerged to be the biggest global health threat worldwide. COVID-19 marks the emergence of the third large-scale epidemic related to the coronavirus, after SARS-CoV in 2002 and Middle-East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERSCoV) in 2012. The pandemic has had a harmful effect on the public mental health, especially on depression. Increasing systematic reviews (SRs) of coronavirus were focusing on depression. However, the methodological quality of these SRs is unclear. Therefore, to evaluate and compare the normativity of report of SR, we conducted a comprehensive overview of depression during the SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 pandemics.

METHODS:

Two independent reviewers will conduct comprehensively searches in PubMed, EMBASE.com, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Chinese biomedical literature database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan fang Database, Chongqing VIP (CQVIP). Reference lists of articles, gray literature, and conference proceedings will also be searched. We will extract the data and assess the methodological quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) measurement tool and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. General characteristics of the eligible SRs will be summarized and described. We will provide AMSTAR-2 and PRISMA assessments in tabular form for each review, the total percentage of each item will be calculated. Endnote X8 and EXCEL will be used.

RESULTS:

Using the draft search strategy of databases, 8 SRs met the a priori criteria and were included. The overview of SRs will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION:

Our overview will be a comprehensive synthesis of the existing systemic review on depression with SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION INPLASY202080003.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome / Depression / Pandemics Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome / Depression / Pandemics Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2020 Document Type: Article