Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study.
Groarke, Jenny M; Berry, Emma; Graham-Wisener, Lisa; McKenna-Plumley, Phoebe E; McGlinchey, Emily; Armour, Cherie.
  • Groarke JM; Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life (CIHRQoL), School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • Berry E; Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life (CIHRQoL), School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • Graham-Wisener L; Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life (CIHRQoL), School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • McKenna-Plumley PE; Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life (CIHRQoL), School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • McGlinchey E; Stress Trauma and Related Conditions (STARC) Research Lab, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • Armour C; Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life (CIHRQoL), School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0239698, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-792192
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Loneliness is a significant public health issue. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in lockdown measures limiting social contact. The UK public are worried about the impact of these measures on mental health outcomes. Understanding the prevalence and predictors of loneliness at this time is a priority issue for research.

METHOD:

The study employed a cross-sectional online survey design. Baseline data collected between March 23rd and April 24th 2020 from UK adults in the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study were analysed (N = 1964, 18-87 years, M = 37.11, SD = 12.86, 70% female). Logistic regression analysis examined the influence of sociodemographic, social, health and COVID-19 specific factors on loneliness.

RESULTS:

The prevalence of loneliness was 27% (530/1964). Risk factors for loneliness were younger age group (OR 4.67-5.31), being separated or divorced (OR 2.29), scores meeting clinical criteria for depression (OR 1.74), greater emotion regulation difficulties (OR 1.04), and poor quality sleep due to the COVID-19 crisis (OR 1.30). Higher levels of social support (OR 0.92), being married/co-habiting (OR 0.35) and living with a greater number of adults (OR 0.87) were protective factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rates of loneliness during the initial phase of lockdown were high. Risk factors were not specific to the COVID-19 crisis. Findings suggest that supportive interventions to reduce loneliness should prioritise younger people and those with mental health symptoms. Improving emotion regulation and sleep quality, and increasing social support may be optimal initial targets to reduce the impact of COVID-19 regulations on mental health outcomes.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Loneliness Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0239698

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Loneliness Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0239698