Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Government mandated lockdowns do not reduce COVID-19 deaths: implications for evaluating the stringent New Zealand response
Working Papers in Economics Department of Economics, University of Waikato ; 06(20), 2020.
Article in English | GIM | ID: covidwho-825456
ABSTRACT
The New Zealand policy response to Coronavirus (Covid-19) was the most stringent in the world during the Level 4 lockdown. At least ten billion New Zealand dollars of output (3.3% of GDP) were lost then, compared to staying at Level 2. For lockdown to be optimal requires large health benefits to offset these output losses. Forecast deaths from epidemiological models are not valid counterfactuals, due to poor identification. Instead, I use empirical data, based on variation amongst United States counties, over one-fifth of which just had social distancing rather than lockdown. Political drivers of lockdown provide identification. Lockdowns do not reduce Covid-19 deaths. This pattern is visible on each date that key lockdown decisions were made in New Zealand. The ineffectiveness of lockdowns implies New Zealand suffered large economic costs for little benefit in terms of lives saved.
Search on Google
Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: GIM Type of study: Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Working Papers in Economics Department of Economics, University of Waikato Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: GIM Type of study: Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Working Papers in Economics Department of Economics, University of Waikato Year: 2020 Document Type: Article