Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Risko, Nicholas; Werner, Kalin; Offorjebe, O Agatha; Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I; Wallis, Lee A; Razzak, Junaid.
  • Risko N; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
  • Werner K; University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Offorjebe OA; University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
  • Vecino-Ortiz AI; Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
  • Wallis LA; University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Razzak J; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0240503, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-840859
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In this paper, we predict the health and economic consequences of immediate investment in personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers (HCWs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS:

To account for health consequences, we estimated mortality for HCWs and present a cost-effectiveness and return on investment (ROI) analysis using a decision-analytic model with Bayesian multivariate sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. Data sources included inputs from the World Health Organization Essential Supplies Forecasting Tool and the Imperial College of London epidemiologic model.

RESULTS:

An investment of $9.6 billion USD would adequately protect HCWs in all LMICs. This intervention would save 2,299,543 lives across LMICs, costing $59 USD per HCW case averted and $4,309 USD per HCW life saved. The societal ROI would be $755.3 billion USD, the equivalent of a 7,932% return. Regional and national estimates are also presented.

DISCUSSION:

In scenarios where PPE remains scarce, 70-100% of HCWs will get infected, irrespective of nationwide social distancing policies. Maintaining HCW infection rates below 10% and mortality below 1% requires inclusion of a PPE scale-up strategy as part of the pandemic response. In conclusion, wide-scale procurement and distribution of PPE for LMICs is an essential strategy to prevent widespread HCW morbidity and mortality. It is cost-effective and yields a large downstream return on investment.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Coronavirus Infections / Personal Protective Equipment / Health Workforce Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0240503

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Coronavirus Infections / Personal Protective Equipment / Health Workforce Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0240503