Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention strategies including pre-endoscopic virus testing and use of high risk personal protective equipment.
Ebigbo, Alanna; Römmele, Christoph; Bartenschlager, Christina; Temizel, Selin; Kling, Elisabeth; Brunner, Jens; Messmann, Helmut.
  • Ebigbo A; Department of Gastroenterology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Römmele C; Department of Gastroenterology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Bartenschlager C; Chair of Health Care Operations/Health Information Management (UNIKA-T), Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Temizel S; Department of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Kling E; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Brunner J; Chair of Health Care Operations/Health Information Management (UNIKA-T), Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Messmann H; Department of Gastroenterology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Endoscopy ; 53(2): 156-161, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-882960
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Infection prevention strategies to protect healthcare workers in endoscopy units during the post-peak phase of the COVID-19 pandemic are currently under intense discussion. In this paper, the cost-effectiveness of routine pre-endoscopy testing and high risk personal protective equipment (PPE) is addressed.

METHOD:

A model based on theoretical assumptions of 10 000 asymptomatic patients presenting to a high volume center was created. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and absolute costs per endoscopy were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS:

ICER values for universal testing decreased with increasing prevalence rates. For higher prevalence rates (≥ 1 %), ICER values were lowest for routine pre-endoscopy testing coupled with use of high risk PPE, while cost per endoscopy was lowest for routine use of high risk PPE without universal testing.

CONCLUSION:

In general, routine pre-endoscopy testing combined with high risk PPE becomes more cost-effective with rising prevalence rates of COVID-19.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Exposure / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Endoscopy / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Endoscopy Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: A-1294-0427

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Exposure / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Endoscopy / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Endoscopy Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: A-1294-0427