Your browser doesn't support javascript.
State of Personal Protective Equipment Practice in Indian Intensive Care Units amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey.
Haji, Jumana Yusuf; Subramaniam, Ashwin; Kumar, Prashant; Ramanathan, Kollengode; Rajamani, Arvind.
  • Haji JY; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Aster CMI Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Subramaniam A; Department of Intensive Care, Frankston Hospital, VIC Monash University VIC, Frankston, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kumar P; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kailash Hospital Neuro Institute, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Ramanathan K; Department of Critical Care, National University Hospital, Singapore.
  • Rajamani A; Department of Intensive Care, University of Sydney, Nepean Clinical School and Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 24(9): 809-816, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-883964
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Optimal personal protective equipment (PPE) preparedness is key to minimize healthcare workers (HCW) infection with COVID-19. This two-phase survey evaluated PPE preparedness (adherence to Ministry of Health India (MoH) PPE-recommendations; HCW-training; PPE-inventory; PPE-breach management) in Indian intensive care units (ICU). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The phase 1 survey was distributed electronically to intensivists from 481 Indian hospitals between March 25, 2020, and April 06, 2020, as part of a multinational survey. Phase 2 was repeated in 320 Indian hospitals between April 20, 2020, and April 30, 2020.

RESULTS:

Response rate was 25% from 22 states. PPE practice varied between states and between private, government, and medical colleges. Between phase 1 and phase 2, all aspects of PPE training improved donning/doffing 43% vs 66%, respectively; p value <0.01); safe waste disposal practices (38% vs 52%; p value = 0.09); intubation training (18% vs 31%; p value = 0.05); and transport (18% vs 31%; p value = 0.05). Perception of confidence for adequate PPE-training improved from 39 to 53% (p value = 0.26). In all, 47 to 60% ICUs adhered to MoH recommendations. Wearing N95-masks at all times increased from 47 to 60% (p value = 0.89). Very few ICUs provided quantitative/qualitative N95 masks fit testing (12% vs 29%; p value <0.01). Low-cost practices like "buddy-system" for donning-doffing (27% vs 44%; p value = 0.02) and showering after PPE breach (10% vs 8%; p value = 0.63) were underutilized. There was reluctance to PPE reuse. In all, 71% were unaware/diffident about PPE inventory.

CONCLUSION:

Despite interstate variability, most ICUs conformed to MoH recommendations. This survey conducted during initial pandemic phase demonstrated improved PPE preparedness uniformly across India with scope for further improvement. We suggest implementation of quality improvement measures to improve pandemic preparedness and minimize HCW infection rates, focused on regular PPE training, buddy system, and PPE-breach management. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE Haji JY, Subramaniam A, Kumar P, Ramanathan K, Rajamani A. State of Personal Protective Equipment Practice in Indian Intensive Care Units amidst COVID-19 Pandemic A Nationwide Survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(9)809-816.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jp-journals-10071-23550

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jp-journals-10071-23550