Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Case Fatality Rates for Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Meta-analysis.
Lim, Zheng Jie; Subramaniam, Ashwin; Ponnapa Reddy, Mallikarjuna; Blecher, Gabriel; Kadam, Umesh; Afroz, Afsana; Billah, Baki; Ashwin, Sushma; Kubicki, Mark; Bilotta, Federico; Curtis, J Randall; Rubulotta, Francesca.
  • Lim ZJ; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
  • Subramaniam A; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ponnapa Reddy M; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences.
  • Blecher G; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kadam U; School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, and.
  • Afroz A; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Billah B; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Calvary Hospital Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
  • Ashwin S; Emergency Department, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kubicki M; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Monash Health Casey Hospital, Casey, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bilotta F; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Werribee Mercy Hospital, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
  • Curtis JR; Center for Integrated Critical Care, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne Medical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Rubulotta F; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Werribee Mercy Hospital, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 203(1): 54-66, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-894941
ABSTRACT
Rationale Initial reports of case fatality rates (CFRs) among adults with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are highly variable.

Objectives:

To examine the CFR of patients with COVID-19 receiving IMV.

Methods:

Two authors independently searched PubMed, Embase, medRxiv, bioRxiv, the COVID-19 living systematic review, and national registry databases. The primary outcome was the "reported CFR" for patients with confirmed COVID-19 requiring IMV. "Definitive hospital CFR" for patients with outcomes at hospital discharge was also investigated. Finally, CFR was analyzed by patient age, geographic region, and study quality on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Measurements and

Results:

Sixty-nine studies were included, describing 57,420 adult patients with COVID-19 who received IMV. Overall reported CFR was estimated as 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39-52%). Fifty-four of 69 studies stated whether hospital outcomes were available but provided a definitive hospital outcome on only 13,120 (22.8%) of the total IMV patient population. Among studies in which age-stratified CFR was available, pooled CFR estimates ranged from 47.9% (95% CI, 46.4-49.4%) in younger patients (age ≤40 yr) to 84.4% (95% CI, 83.3-85.4%) in older patients (age >80 yr). CFR was also higher in early COVID-19 epicenters. Overall heterogeneity is high (I2 >90%), with nonsignificant Egger's regression test suggesting no publication bias.

Conclusions:

Almost half of patients with COVID-19 receiving IMV died based on the reported CFR, but variable CFR reporting methods resulted in a wide range of CFRs between studies. The reported CFR was higher in older patients and in early pandemic epicenters, which may be influenced by limited ICU resources. Reporting of definitive outcomes on all patients would facilitate comparisons between studies.Systematic review registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020186997).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Pandemics Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Journal subject: Critical Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Rccm.202006-2405OC

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Pandemics Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Journal subject: Critical Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Rccm.202006-2405OC