Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A multiple-center clinical evaluation of a new real-time reverse transcriptase PCR diagnostic kit for SARS-CoV-2.
Guo, Jing-Jing; Yu, Yan-Hua; Ma, Xue-Ying; Liu, Ya-Nan; Fang, Qian; Qu, Pei; Guo, Jie; Lou, Jin-Li; Wang, Ya-Jie.
  • Guo JJ; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Yu YH; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Ma XY; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Liu YN; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Fang Q; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Qu P; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Guo J; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Lou JL; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Wang YJ; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Future Virol ; 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-895275
ABSTRACT

Aim:

The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had serious repercussions worldwide. This study was aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a new kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2 compared with similar detection kit. Materials &

methods:

A total of 500 subjects were included and tested with both the new test and control kits. Clinical diagnosis results were taken as the reference standard.

Results:

Compared with clinical diagnosis, the sensitivity of the test kit was 82.64%, specificity was 98.45% and total coincidence rate was 90.80%. The total coincidence rate, sensitivity and specificity between control kit and clinical diagnosis were 89.20%, 78.10% and 99.61%, respectively.

Conclusions:

The new kit was comparable to the similar detection kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in sensitivity, specificity and total coincidence rate.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fvl-2020-0299

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fvl-2020-0299