Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Video Laryngoscope Intubation With an Aerosol Barrier Device: A Randomized Sequential Crossover Pilot Study.
Idei, Masafumi; Nomura, Takeshi; Jouvet, Philippe; Aubin, Carl Eric; Kawaguchi, Atsushi; Nakagawa, Masashi.
  • Idei M; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nomura T; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Jouvet P; Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Aubin CE; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Kawaguchi A; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nakagawa M; Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Crit Care Explor ; 2(10): e0234, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-900556
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the impact of the use of aerosol barrier device, Splashguard-CG, on the endotracheal intubation with different types of laryngoscope.

DESIGN:

A pilot randomized sequential crossover simulation study.

SETTING:

A single academic center in Japan.

SUBJECTS:

Physicians in a single academic university hospital in Japan.

INTERVENTIONS:

Use of Splashguard-CG. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

All participants were asked to perform endotracheal intubation to a manikin simulator using three different devices (Macintosh laryngoscope; Airway Scope [Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan]; and McGRATH MAC [Aircraft Medical, Edinburgh, United Kingdom]) with and without Splashguard-CG in place, which required a total of six attempts and measured the intubation time as the primary outcome. Thirty physicians (15 experienced physicians and 15 less-experienced physicians) were included. Intubation time using Macintosh laryngoscope was significantly longer in the group with Macintosh laryngoscope and Splashguard-CG compared with the group without Splashguard-CG by the median difference of 4.3 seconds (interquartile range, 2.6-7.4 s; p < 0.001). There was no significant increase in the intubation time with or without Splashguard-CG for the Airway Scope (0.6 s; interquartile range, -3.7 to 3.2 s; p = 0.97) and the McGRATH MAC (0.5 s; interquartile range, -1.4 to 4.6 s; p = 0.09). This trend was found in both the experienced and less-experienced groups. We observed significant increases of subjective difficulty of the endotracheal intubation evaluated by using a Visual Analog Scale in the Splashguard-CG groups for all three types of devices.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of a video laryngoscope with an aerosol barrier device does not impact the time required endotracheal intubation in a simulation environment. This method can be considered as airway management for coronavirus disease 2019.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cce.0000000000000234

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cce.0000000000000234